» Articles » PMID: 30187404

Environmental Exposure of Anthropogenic Micropollutants in the Prut River at the Romanian-Moldavian Border: a Snapshot in the Lower Danube River Basin

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Sep 7
PMID 30187404
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Prut River, the second longest tributary of the Danube river, was investigated for a wide range of anthropogenic organic pollutants to fill the data gap on environmental contamination in eastern European surface waters. In this study, the occurrence of a wide range of organic pollutants was measured along the transboundary Prut River, between Sculeni and Branza in 2010-2012. Using two different analytical methods, gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry, over 300 compounds were screened for and 88 compounds were determined in the Prut River. In general, the chemicals occurred at low levels. At the last sampling site upstream of the confluence with the Danube river at Branza, the highest average concentrations (≥ 100 ng L) were determined for the artificial sweetener acesulfame, the pharmaceuticals metformin, 4-acetamidoantipyrene, and 4,4,5,8-tetramethylchroman-2-ol, the antioxidants 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyanisol, and 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-toluene, the personal care products HHCB (galaxolide), 4-phenyl-benzophenone, and octyl dimethyl-p-aminobenzoic acid, the industrial chemical diphenylsulfone, and the sterol cholesterol. Low concentrations of agricultural pesticides occurred in the catchment. At Branza, the total accumulated load of all measured compounds was calculated to be almost 19 kg day. In comparison to the Rhine River, the loads in the Prut, determined with same LC-HRMS method for the same set of analytes, were two orders of magnitude lower. Discharge of wastewater without proper treatment from the city of Iasi in the Jijia catchment (Romania) as well as from the city of Cahul (Moldova) revealed a distinct increase in concentrations and loads in the Prut at Frasinesti and Branza. Thus, an implementation of wastewater treatment capacities in the Prut River basin would considerably reduce the loads of micropollutants from urban point sources.

Citing Articles

Macro and microplastic pollution in Romania: addressing knowledge gaps and potential solutions under the circular economy framework.

Mihai F, Ulman S, Pop V PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17546.

PMID: 38938611 PMC: 11210483. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17546.


An Integrated Approach of Bioassays and Non-Target Screening for the Assessment of Endocrine-Disrupting Activities in Tap Water and Identification of Novel Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Liu S, Liu J Toxics. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38668470 PMC: 11054029. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12040247.


Phytochemical Profiling, In Vitro Biological Activities, and In-Silico Studies of : An Unexplored Plant.

Aati H, Anwar M, Al-Qahtani J, Al-Taweel A, Khan K, Aati S Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(9).

PMID: 36139935 PMC: 9495161. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11091155.


Releases of Fire-Derived Contaminants from Polymer Pipes Made of Polyvinyl Chloride.

Chong N, Abdulramoni S, Patterson D, Brown H Toxics. 2019; 7(4).

PMID: 31717947 PMC: 6958356. DOI: 10.3390/toxics7040057.

References
1.
Moldovan Z, Chira R, Alder A . Environmental exposure of pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances in the Somes River before and after upgrading the municipal wastewater treatment plant Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008; 16 Suppl 1:S46-54. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-008-0047-7. View

2.
Wolschke H, Suhring R, Xie Z, Ebinghaus R . Organophosphorus flame retardants and plasticizers in the aquatic environment: A case study of the Elbe River, Germany. Environ Pollut. 2015; 206:488-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.002. View

3.
Ruff M, Mueller M, Loos M, Singer H . Quantitative target and systematic non-target analysis of polar organic micro-pollutants along the river Rhine using high-resolution mass-spectrometry--Identification of unknown sources and compounds. Water Res. 2015; 87:145-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.017. View

4.
Tran N, Hu J, Li J, Ong S . Suitability of artificial sweeteners as indicators of raw wastewater contamination in surface water and groundwater. Water Res. 2013; 48:443-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.053. View

5.
Scheurer M, Brauch H, Lange F . Analysis and occurrence of seven artificial sweeteners in German waste water and surface water and in soil aquifer treatment (SAT). Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009; 394(6):1585-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2881-y. View