» Articles » PMID: 30185567

Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Inserts Promoting Cessation and Dissuasive Cigarettes Among Young Adult Smokers in the UK: a Cross-sectional Online Survey

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Sep 7
PMID 30185567
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive.

Design: Cross-sectional online survey.

Setting: UK.

Participants: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette).

Results: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried).

Conclusions: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.

Citing Articles

Tobacco-control policy support among people from low socioeconomic positions in Massachusetts.

Vazquez-Otero C, Bekalu M, Dhawan D, Viswanath K Prev Med Rep. 2023; 35:102336.

PMID: 37564123 PMC: 10410238. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102336.


A mixed-method study of perceptions of cigarette pack inserts among adult smokers from New York and South Carolina exposed as part of a randomized controlled trial.

Hackworth E, Budiongan J, Lambert V, Kim M, Ferguson S, Niederdeppe J Health Educ Res. 2023; 38(6):548-562.

PMID: 37450334 PMC: 10714041. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyad030.


Perceptions of novel warnings compared with current warning on tobacco packs, and warnings on cigarette sticks: A cross-sectional survey of college students in Southern India.

Mullapudi S, Kulkarni M, Kamath V, Britton J, Moodie C, Kamath A Tob Induc Dis. 2023; 21:50.

PMID: 37123347 PMC: 10141829. DOI: 10.18332/tid/160082.


Reasons for Using Roll-Your-Own Tobacco and Perceptions of Health-Promoting Pack Inserts: A Focus Group Study with Roll-Your-Own Tobacco Smokers in Scotland.

Moodie C, ODonnell R Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(12):1937-1944.

PMID: 35907266 PMC: 9653084. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac184.


Cross-sectional online survey of the impact of new tobacco health warnings in Colombia.

Adams S, Clavijo A, Tamayo R, Maynard O BMJ Open. 2022; 12(6):e056754.

PMID: 35760539 PMC: 9237901. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056754.


References
1.
Moodie C, MacKintosh A, Gallopel-Morvan K, Hastings G, Ford A . Adolescents' Perceptions of an On-cigarette Health Warning. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 19(10):1232-1237. PMC: 6155467. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw165. View

2.
Hassan L, Shiu E . No place to hide: two pilot studies assessing the effectiveness of adding a health warning to the cigarette stick. Tob Control. 2013; 24(e1):e3-5. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051238. View

3.
Kotnowski K, Fong G, Gallopel-Morvan K, Islam T, Hammond D . The Impact of Cigarette Packaging Design Among Young Females in Canada: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015; 18(5):1348-56. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv114. View

4.
Hoek J, Gendall P, Eckert C, Kemper J, Louviere J . Effects of brand variants on smokers' choice behaviours and risk perceptions. Tob Control. 2015; 25(2):160-5. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052094. View

5.
Hiscock R, Murray S, Brose L, McEwen A, Leonardi Bee J, Dobbie F . Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers. Addict Behav. 2013; 38(11):2787-96. PMC: 3776925. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010. View