Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Inserts Promoting Cessation and Dissuasive Cigarettes Among Young Adult Smokers in the UK: a Cross-sectional Online Survey
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To explore young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack inserts promoting cessation and cigarettes designed to be dissuasive.
Design: Cross-sectional online survey.
Setting: UK.
Participants: The final sample was 1766 young adult smokers, with 50.3% male and 71.6% white British. To meet the inclusion criteria, participants had to be 16-34 years old and smoke factory-made cigarettes.
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Salience of inserts, perceptions of inserts as information provision, perceptions of inserts on quitting, support for inserts and perceived appeal, harm and trial of three cigarettes (a standard cigarette, a standard cigarette displaying the warning 'Smoking kills' and a green cigarette).
Results: Half the sample indicated that they would read inserts with three-fifths indicating that they are a good way to provide information about quitting (61%). Just over half indicated that inserts would make them think more about quitting (53%), help if they decided to quit (52%), are an effective way of encouraging smokers to quit (53%) and supported having them in all packs (55%). Participants who smoked factory-made cigarettes and other tobacco products (compared with exclusive factory-made cigarette smokers), had made a quit attempt within the last 6 months (compared with those that had never made a quit attempt) or were likely to make a successful quit attempt in the next 6 months (compared with those unlikely to make a quit attempt in the next 6 months) were more likely to indicate that inserts could assist with cessation. Multivariable logistic regression modelling suggested that compared with the standard cigarette, the cigarette with warning (adjusted OR=17.71; 95% CI 13.75 to 22.80) and green cigarette (adjusted OR=30.88; 95% CI 23.98 to 39.76) were much less desirable (less appealing, more harmful and less likely to be tried).
Conclusions: Inserts and dissuasive cigarettes offer policy makers additional ways of using the pack to reduce smoking.
Tobacco-control policy support among people from low socioeconomic positions in Massachusetts.
Vazquez-Otero C, Bekalu M, Dhawan D, Viswanath K Prev Med Rep. 2023; 35:102336.
PMID: 37564123 PMC: 10410238. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102336.
Hackworth E, Budiongan J, Lambert V, Kim M, Ferguson S, Niederdeppe J Health Educ Res. 2023; 38(6):548-562.
PMID: 37450334 PMC: 10714041. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyad030.
Mullapudi S, Kulkarni M, Kamath V, Britton J, Moodie C, Kamath A Tob Induc Dis. 2023; 21:50.
PMID: 37123347 PMC: 10141829. DOI: 10.18332/tid/160082.
Moodie C, ODonnell R Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 24(12):1937-1944.
PMID: 35907266 PMC: 9653084. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac184.
Cross-sectional online survey of the impact of new tobacco health warnings in Colombia.
Adams S, Clavijo A, Tamayo R, Maynard O BMJ Open. 2022; 12(6):e056754.
PMID: 35760539 PMC: 9237901. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056754.