» Articles » PMID: 30183780

Listening to Yourself is Special: Evidence from Global Speech Rate Tracking

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Sep 6
PMID 30183780
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Listeners are known to use adjacent contextual speech rate in processing temporally ambiguous speech sounds. For instance, an ambiguous vowel between short /α/ and long /a:/ in Dutch sounds relatively long (i.e., as /a:/) embedded in a fast precursor sentence, but short in a slow sentence. Besides the local speech rate, listeners also track talker-specific global speech rates. However, it is yet unclear whether other talkers' global rates are encoded with reference to a listener's self-produced rate. Three experiments addressed this question. In Experiment 1, one group of participants was instructed to speak fast, whereas another group had to speak slowly. The groups were compared on their perception of ambiguous /α/-/a:/ vowels embedded in neutral rate speech from another talker. In Experiment 2, the same participants listened to playback of their own speech and again evaluated target vowels in neutral rate speech. Neither of these experiments provided support for the involvement of self-produced speech in perception of another talker's speech rate. Experiment 3 repeated Experiment 2 but with a new participant sample that was unfamiliar with the participants from Experiment 2. This experiment revealed fewer /a:/ responses in neutral speech in the group also listening to a fast rate, suggesting that neutral speech sounds slow in the presence of a fast talker and vice versa. Taken together, the findings show that self-produced speech is processed differently from speech produced by others. They carry implications for our understanding of rate-dependent speech perception in dialogue settings, suggesting that both perceptual and cognitive mechanisms are involved.

Citing Articles

Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.

Reinisch E, Bosker H Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(7):2303-2318.

PMID: 35996057 PMC: 9481500. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02554-8.


Timing of brain entrainment to the speech envelope during speaking, listening and self-listening.

Perez A, Davis M, Ince R, Zhang H, Fu Z, Lamarca M Cognition. 2022; 224:105051.

PMID: 35219954 PMC: 9112165. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105051.


Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention.

Bosker H, Sjerps M, Reinisch E Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):5607.

PMID: 32221376 PMC: 7101381. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62613-8.

References
1.
Baese-Berk M, Heffner C, Dilley L, Pitt M, Morrill T, McAuley J . Long-term temporal tracking of speech rate affects spoken-word recognition. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25(8):1546-53. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614533705. View

2.
Wade T, Holt L . Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories. Percept Psychophys. 2006; 67(6):939-50. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193621. View

3.
Sui J, He X, Humphreys G . Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(5):1105-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0029792. View

4.
Eger N, Reinisch E . The impact of one's own voice and production skills on word recognition in a second language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018; 45(3):552-571. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000599. View

5.
Schwab S . Relationship between speech rate perceived and produced by the listener. Phonetica. 2012; 68(4):243-55. DOI: 10.1159/000335578. View