» Articles » PMID: 30181674

Design and Evaluation of a Longitudinal Faculty Development Program to Advance Scholarly Writing Among Pharmacy Practice Faculty

Overview
Journal Am J Pharm Educ
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2018 Sep 6
PMID 30181674
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To describe the design and evaluation of a six-month longitudinal faculty development program designed to promote experience and skills in scholarly writing among pharmacy practice faculty. Writer's Block uses a scheduled weekly writing time, peer support, and multiple accountability measures to promote progress in manuscript writing. Faculty participation, satisfaction, and manuscript writing progress were used to evaluate the program's success. Demographic data describing faculty participation in at least one of three cohorts of Writer's Block were collected. Satisfaction was determined using an anonymous online survey. Writing progress was determined through reporting of weekly manuscript word counts and submission to a peer-reviewed journal. Twelve assistant professors participated in one or more program cohorts to develop 20 manuscripts. Twelve (60%) manuscripts were submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Of these, 10 (83%) have been published or accepted for publication, and one (8%) is undergoing peer review. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the program was helpful in starting and advancing manuscript writing. Specific program components meant to encourage writing accountability, such as monthly meetings, reporting word counts, and setting a weekly writing schedule, were highly valued. This program is the first described writing-focused faculty development program among pharmacy practice faculty. It successfully engaged pharmacy practice faculty members in the scholarly writing process, evidenced by participation in the program, participant satisfaction, and documented progress in manuscript development.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.

Hohlfeld A, Kredo T, Clarke M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):310.

PMID: 39707441 PMC: 11660680. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.


First-year evaluation of a campus-wide, cross-disciplinary scholarly writing development program supported by a center for biomedical research excellence (COBRE).

Franks A, Teeter B, Davis P, Allred M, Landes R, Koturbash I PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312322.

PMID: 39471171 PMC: 11521313. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312322.


Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice.

Farias-Ruiz C, Byrd T, MacLaughlin E, Hall Nd 2nd R Pharmacy (Basel). 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36827669 PMC: 9959709. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11010031.


Qualitative evaluation of postdoctoral trainee and faculty advisor experiences within a research-intensive school of pharmacy.

McLaughlin J, Morbitzer K, Hahn F, Minshew L, Brouwer K BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):691.

PMID: 36153521 PMC: 9509594. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03750-8.


Practical Considerations for Researchers at Teaching-Focused Colleges.

Morris C, Lionello-DeNolf K Behav Anal Pract. 2022; 15(1):339-346.

PMID: 35340389 PMC: 8854509. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00536-6.


References
1.
Simpson D, McLaughlin C, Schiedermayer D . Writing "blitzes" for medical educators. Acad Med. 2000; 75(5):555. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200005000-00087. View

2.
Grzybowski S, Bates J, Calam B, Alred J, Martin R, Andrew R . A physician peer support writing group. Fam Med. 2003; 35(3):195-201. View

3.
Steinert Y, McLeod P, Liben S, Snell L . Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group. Med Teach. 2008; 30(8):e280-5. DOI: 10.1080/01421590802337120. View

4.
Keen A . Writing for publication: pressures, barriers and support strategies. Nurse Educ Today. 2006; 27(5):382-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.05.019. View

5.
Brandon C, Jamadar D, Girish G, Dong Q, Morag Y, Mullan P . Peer support of a faculty "writers' circle" increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship. Acad Radiol. 2015; 22(4):534-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006. View