Cost-effectiveness of Single-dose Zoledronic Acid for Nursing Home Residents with Osteoporosis in the USA
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine administration of single-dose zoledronic acid for nursing home residents with osteoporosis in the USA.
Design: Markov cohort simulation model based on published literature from a healthcare sector perspective over a lifetime horizon.
Setting: Nursing homes.
Participants: A hypothetical cohort of nursing home residents aged 85 years with osteoporosis.
Interventions: Two strategies were compared: (1) a single intravenous dose of zoledronic acid 5 mg and (2) usual care (supplementation of calcium and vitamin D only).
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), as measured by cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Results: Compared with usual care, zoledronic acid had an ICER of $207 400 per QALY gained and was not cost-effective at a conventional willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained. The results were robust to a reasonable range of assumptions about incidence, mortality, quality-of-life effects and the cost of hip fracture and the cost of zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid had a potential to become cost-effective if a fracture risk reduction with zoledronic acid was higher than 23% or if 6-month mortality in nursing home residents was lower than 16%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the zoledronic acid would be cost-effective in 14%, 27% and 44% of simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50 000, $100 000 or $200 000 per QALY gained, respectively.
Conclusions: Routine administration of single-dose zoledronic acid in nursing home residents with osteoporosis is not a cost-effective use of resources in the USA but could be justifiable in those with a favourable life expectancy.
Zandieh N, Hemami M, Darvishi A, Hasheminejad S, Abdollahi Z, Zarei M BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022; 22(1):1.
PMID: 34980092 PMC: 8722369. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03474-0.
Jalan H, Perumal R, Prabhu S, Palanivelayutham S, Viswanathan V, Rajasekaran S J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 20:101472.
PMID: 34178598 PMC: 8213889. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.06.002.
An Updated Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Drugs for Osteoporosis.
Li N, Cornelissen D, Silverman S, Pinto D, Si L, Kremer I Pharmacoeconomics. 2020; 39(2):181-209.
PMID: 33026634 PMC: 7867562. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00965-9.
Azharuddin M, Adil M, Khan R, Ghosh P, Kapur P, Sharma M Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020; 6(2):39-52.
PMID: 32715093 PMC: 7374246. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.05.006.
You R, Zhang Y, Wu D, Liu J, Qian X, Luo N Front Pharmacol. 2020; 11:456.
PMID: 32425768 PMC: 7203488. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00456.