» Articles » PMID: 30180209

The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Cymothoa Indica Has a Highly Rearranged Gene Order and Clusters at the Very Base of the Isopoda Clade

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Sep 5
PMID 30180209
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As a result of great diversity in life histories and a large number of described species, taxonomic and phylogenetic uncertainty permeates the entire crustacean order of Isopoda. Large molecular datasets capable of providing sufficiently high phylogenetic resolution, such as mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes), are needed to infer their evolutionary history with confidence, but isopod mitogenomes remain remarkably poorly represented in public databases. We sequenced the complete mitogenome of Cymothoa indica, a species belonging to a family from which no mitochondrial genome was sequenced yet, Cymothoidae. The mitogenome (circular, 14484 bp, A+T = 63.8%) is highly compact, appears to be missing two tRNA genes (trnI and trnE), and exhibits a unique gene order with a large number of rearrangements. High compactness and the existence of palindromes indicate that the mechanism behind these rearrangements might be associated with linearization events in its evolutionary history, similar to those proposed for isopods from the Armadillidium genus (Oniscidea). Isopods might present an important model system to study the proposed discontinuity in the dynamics of mitochondrial genomic architecture evolution. Phylogenetic analyses (Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood) conducted using nucleotide sequences of all mitochondrial genes resolved Oniscidea and Cymothoida suborders as paraphyletic. Cymothoa indica was resolved as a sister group (basal) to all remaining isopods, which challenges the accepted isopod phylogeny, where Cymothoida are the most derived, and Phreatoicidea the most basal isopod group. There is growing evidence that Cymothoida suborder might be split into two evolutionary distant clades, with parasitic species being the most basal split in the Isopoda clade, but a much larger amount of molecular resources carrying a high phylogenetic resolution will be needed to infer the remarkably complex evolutionary history of this group of animals with confidence.

Citing Articles

Comparative mitogenomic analysis of subterranean and surface amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda) with special reference to the family Crangonyctidae.

Benito J, Porter M, Niemiller M BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):298.

PMID: 38509489 PMC: 10956265. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10111-w.


Phylogenetic position of Bopyroides hippolytes, with comments on the rearrangement of the mitochondrial genome in isopods (Isopoda: Epicaridea: Bopyridae).

Wu R, Guo R, Xi Q, Paulay G, An J BMC Genomics. 2022; 23(1):253.

PMID: 35366795 PMC: 8976331. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08513-9.


Long-read sequencing reveals atypical mitochondrial genome structure in a New Zealand marine isopod.

Pearman W, Wells S, Dale J, Silander O, Freed N R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(1):211550.

PMID: 35242350 PMC: 8753154. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211550.


Disrupted architecture and fast evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Argeia pugettensis (Isopoda): implications for speciation and fitness.

An J, Zheng W, Liang J, Xi Q, Chen R, Jia J BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):607.

PMID: 32883208 PMC: 7469299. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07021-y.


Architectural instability, inverted skews and mitochondrial phylogenomics of Isopoda: outgroup choice affects the long-branch attraction artefacts.

Zou H, Jakovlic I, Zhang D, Hua C, Chen R, Li W R Soc Open Sci. 2020; 7(2):191887.

PMID: 32257344 PMC: 7062073. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191887.


References
1.
Zou H, Jakovlic I, Chen R, Zhang D, Zhang J, Li W . The complete mitochondrial genome of parasitic nematode Camallanus cotti: extreme discontinuity in the rate of mitogenomic architecture evolution within the Chromadorea class. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):840. PMC: 5669012. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4237-x. View

2.
Poore G, Bruce N . Global diversity of marine isopods (except Asellota and crustacean symbionts). PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e43529. PMC: 3432053. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043529. View

3.
Doublet V, Ubrig E, Alioua A, Bouchon D, Marcade I, Marechal-Drouard L . Large gene overlaps and tRNA processing in the compact mitochondrial genome of the crustacean Armadillidium vulgare. RNA Biol. 2015; 12(10):1159-68. PMC: 4829271. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1090078. View

4.
Burland T . DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol. 1999; 132:71-91. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71. View

5.
Force A, Lynch M, Pickett F, Amores A, Yan Y, Postlethwait J . Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 1999; 151(4):1531-45. PMC: 1460548. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531. View