» Articles » PMID: 30176845

Self-monitoring and Personalized Feedback Based on the Experiencing Sampling Method As a Tool to Boost Depression Treatment: a Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (ZELF-i)

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2018 Sep 5
PMID 30176845
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide. To reduce the societal burden and improve quality of life for individual patients, treatments for depression need to be optimized. There is a particular need for person-tailored interventions that reinforce self-management of patients. Systematic self-monitoring and personalized feedback through the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) could provide such a person-tailored, empowering intervention that enhances treatment outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of self-monitoring and personalized feedback as an add-on tool in the treatment of depressive complaints in a natural setting.

Methods: The ZELF-i study is a pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aim to recruit 150 individuals with depressive symptoms aged between 18 and 65 years, who have an intake for outpatient basic or specialized treatment at a mental health care organization in the North of the Netherlands. After the intake, participants will be randomly allocated to one of three study arms: two experimental groups engaging in 28 days of systematic self-monitoring (5 times per day) and receiving weekly personalized feedback on positive affect and activities ("Do"-module) or on negative affect and thinking patterns ("Think"-module), and a control group receiving no additional intervention. Self-report inventories of depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning and feelings of empowerment will be administered before and after the intervention period, and at follow-up measurements at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. The patient-experienced utility of the intervention will be investigated by a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods.

Discussion: The present study is the first to examine the effects of add-on self-monitoring and personalized feedback on depressive complaints in clinical practice. It is also the first to evaluate two different ESM modules targeted at both of depression's core symptoms. Lastly, it is the first study that uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the patient-experienced utility of ESM with personalized feedback as an intervention for depression. Results of the present study may improve treatment for depression, if the intervention is found to be effective.

Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register, NTR5707 , registered prospectively 1 February 2016.

Citing Articles

The Promise of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Improve Depression Management for Older Adults in Primary Care.

Mindlis I, Rodebaugh T, Kiosses D, Reid M Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2024; 10:23337214241278538.

PMID: 39193007 PMC: 11348361. DOI: 10.1177/23337214241278538.


Towards precision in the diagnostic profiling of patients: leveraging symptom dynamics as a clinical characterisation dimension in the assessment of major depressive disorder.

Ebrahimi O, Borsboom D, Hoekstra R, Epskamp S, Ostinelli E, Bastiaansen J Br J Psychiatry. 2024; 224(5):157-163.

PMID: 38584324 PMC: 11039556. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2024.19.


Usability of the Experience Sampling Method in Specialized Mental Health Care: Pilot Evaluation Study.

Weermeijer J, Wampers M, de Thurah L, Bonnier R, Piot M, Kuppens P JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e48821.

PMID: 37988137 PMC: 10698657. DOI: 10.2196/48821.


Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis.

Wang X, Fei Y, Li W, Liu H, Xiao H, Wu Y BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):316.

PMID: 37726672 PMC: 10507973. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02935-9.


Practitioner and researcher perspectives on the utility of ecological momentary assessment in mental health care: A survey study.

Piot M, Mestdagh M, Riese H, Weermeijer J, Brouwer J, Kuppens P Internet Interv. 2022; 30:100575.

PMID: 36193339 PMC: 9526140. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100575.


References
1.
Burgers J, van Everdingen J . [Evidence-based guideline development in the Netherlands: the EBRO platform]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148(42):2057-9. View

2.
Chambers E, Cook S, Thake A, Foster A, Shaw S, Hutten R . The self-management of longer-term depression: learning from the patient, a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015; 15:172. PMC: 4513949. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0550-6. View

3.
Telford C, McCarthy-Jones S, Corcoran R, Rowse G . Experience Sampling Methodology studies of depression: the state of the art. Psychol Med. 2011; 42(6):1119-29. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291711002200. View

4.
Huber M, Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad A, Kromhout D . How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. View

5.
Torous J, Chan S, Yee-Marie Tan S, Behrens J, Mathew I, Conrad E . Patient Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Apps to Monitor Symptoms of Mental Health Conditions: A Survey in Four Geographically Distinct Psychiatric Clinics. JMIR Ment Health. 2015; 1(1):e5. PMC: 4607390. DOI: 10.2196/mental.4004. View