Attentional Bias to Cannabis Cues in Cannabis Users but Not Cocaine Users

Overview

Journal Addict Behav

Specialties Psychiatry
Social Sciences

Date 2018 Sep 4

PMID 30176501

Citations 8

Authors

Joseph L Alcorn 3rd

Katherine R Marks

William W Stoops

Craig R Rush

Joshua A Lile

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Attentional bias to drug cues has been associated with the problematic use of drugs, including cannabis. The cognitive mechanisms underlying this bias are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cannabis-cue attentional bias is associated with disruptions in attentional processing. To this end, a novel cannabis-cue visual probe task that incorporated eye tracking technology and attention-based metrics derived from signal detection theory was administered to seventeen individuals who reported daily/near-daily cannabis use. Seventeen individuals with cocaine use disorder were also enrolled as a clinical-control group. Cannabis and neutral images were briefly presented side-by-side on a computer screen, followed by the appearance of a "go" or "no-go" target upon offset of both images to permit assessment of attention-based performance. Cannabis users exhibited attentional bias to cannabis cues, as measured by fixation time and response time, but not cue-dependent disruptions on subsequent attentional performance. Cocaine users did not display an attentional bias to cannabis cues but did display poorer attentional performance relative to cannabis users. These results indicate that attentional bias to cannabis cues is selective to cannabis use history and not associated with impaired attentional processing.

Citing Articles

The subjective value of social context in people who use cannabis.

Shellenberg T, Strickland J, Bergeria C, Regnier S, Stoops W, Lile J Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024; 32(5):518-528.

PMID: 38695809 PMC: 11427141. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000717.

Late-stage Attentional Bias towards Food Cues Varies According to Weight Status.

Wheeler N, Colella J, Anderson 3rd R, McFee K, Flack K Med Res Arch. 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 38031576 PMC: 10686576. DOI: 10.18103/mra.v11i6.3918.

Biased processing of game-related information in problematic mobile gaming users.

Bai Y, Elhai J, Montag C, Yang H J Behav Addict. 2023; 12(2):480-489.

PMID: 37352094 PMC: 10316168. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2023.00031.

Does auditory attentional bias determine craving for methamphetamine? A pilot study using a word recognition dichotic listening task.

Kazemitabar M, Kheirkhah M, Mokarrami M, Garcia D Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11311.

PMID: 36387442 PMC: 9640968. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11311.

A Brief Introduction to Human Behavioral Pharmacology: Methods, Design Considerations and Ethics.

Stoops W Perspect Behav Sci. 2022; 45(2):361-381.

PMID: 35719875 PMC: 9163231. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00330-5.

References

Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley B, Mogg K . Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 85(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.018. View

Field M . Cannabis 'dependence' and attentional bias for cannabis-related words. Behav Pharmacol. 2005; 16(5-6):473-6. DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200509000-00021. View

Miller M, Fillmore M . Persistence of attentional bias toward alcohol-related stimuli in intoxicated social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 117(2-3):184-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.016. View

Field M, Marhe R, Franken I . The clinical relevance of attentional bias in substance use disorders. CNS Spectr. 2013; 19(3):225-30. DOI: 10.1017/S1092852913000321. View

Marks K, Pike E, Stoops W, Rush C . The magnitude of drug attentional bias is specific to substance use disorder. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015; 29(3):690-5. PMC: 4586301. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000084. View

Field M, Mogg K, Bradley B . Cognitive bias and drug craving in recreational cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 74(1):105-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.12.005. View

Vujanovic A, Wardle M, Liu S, Dias N, Lane S . Attentional bias in adults with cannabis use disorders. J Addict Dis. 2015; 35(2):144-53. PMC: 4867847. DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2015.1116354. View

Hall W . The adverse health effects of cannabis use: what are they, and what are their implications for policy?. Int J Drug Policy. 2009; 20(6):458-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.013. View

Potvin S, Stavro K, Rizkallah E, Pelletier J . Cocaine and cognition: a systematic quantitative review. J Addict Med. 2014; 8(5):368-76. DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000066. View

10.

Field M, Christiansen P . Commentary on, 'Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias'. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 124(3):189-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.009. View

11.

Stanislaw H, Todorov N . Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999; 31(1):137-49. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207704. View

12.

Franken I . Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 27(4):563-79. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2. View

13.

Ataya A, Adams S, Mullings E, Cooper R, Attwood A, Munafo M . Internal reliability of measures of substance-related cognitive bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 121(1-2):148-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.023. View

14.

Field M, Mogg K, Bradley B . Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 173(1-2):116-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1689-2. View

15.

Spiegelhalder K, Jahne A, Kyle S, Beil M, Doll C, Feige B . Is smoking-related attentional bias a useful marker for treatment effects?. Behav Med. 2011; 37(1):26-34. DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2010.543195. View

16.

Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan K, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E . The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57. View

17.

Swift W, Copeland J, Hall W . Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. Addiction. 1999; 93(11):1681-92. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.931116816.x. View

18.

Waters A, Sayette M, Franken I, Schwartz J . Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behav Res Ther. 2005; 43(6):715-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.003. View

19.

Miller M, Fillmore M . The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. 2010; 105(5):883-90. PMC: 2922935. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02860.x. View

20.

Budney A, Vandrey R, Hughes J, Moore B, Bahrenburg B . Oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol suppresses cannabis withdrawal symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 86(1):22-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.014. View