Male Versus Female Skin: What Dermatologists and Cosmeticians Should Know

Overview

Journal Int J Womens Dermatol

Publisher Wolters Kluwer

Date 2018 Sep 4

PMID 30175213

Citations 32

Authors

S Rahrovan

F Fanian

P Mehryan

P Humbert

A Firooz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The skin is important for the perception of health and beauty. Knowledge of the physiological, chemical, and biophysical differences between the skin of male and female patients helps dermatologists develop a proper approach not only for the management of skin diseases but also to properly take care of cosmetic issues. The influence of genetic and environmental factors on skin characteristics is also critical to consider.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed and Google was conducted to compare the biophysical and biomechanical properties of the skin of male and female patients using the keywords "skin", "hydration", "water loss", "sebum", "circulation", "color", "thickness", "elasticity", "pH", "friction", "wrinkle", "sex", "male", and "female".

Results: A total of 1070 titles were found. After removing duplications and non-English papers, the number was reduced to 632. Of the 632 titles, 57 were deemed suitable for inclusion in this review. The studies show that the skin parameters of hydration, transepidermal water loss, sebum, microcirculation, pigmentation, and thickness are generally higher in men but skin pH is higher in women.

Conclusions: These parameters can be considered as age markers in some cases and are susceptible to change according to environment and life style. Biometrological studies of the skin provide useful information in the selection of active principles and other ingredients of formulations to develop a specific approach for cosmetic treatments.

Citing Articles

Exercise-induced local sweating: Greater reduction in women than men with sunscreen use.

Garzon-Mosquera J, Aragon-Vargas L Temperature (Austin). 2025; 12(1):28-39.

PMID: 40041155 PMC: 11875472. DOI: 10.1080/23328940.2024.2396198.

Facial Skincare Routine Adherence in the General Population.

Cliatt L, Petrides J Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75810.

PMID: 39822430 PMC: 11735236. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75810.

An International Examination of Skin Concerns Impacting Self-Confidence Among 5,138 Males.

Flament F, Maudet A, Delaunay C, Amar D, Bayer-Vanmoen M, Imbert Legrain A Acta Derm Venereol. 2024; 104:adv42016.

PMID: 39670440 PMC: 11681148. DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.42016.

Sex Differences in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Analysis of the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry.

Goldburg S, Chen R, Langholff W, Lafferty K, Gooderham M, de Jong E J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2024; 7(3):132-139.

PMID: 39296535 PMC: 11361528. DOI: 10.1177/24755303221099848.

L. Leaf Extract, a Microbiota Green Ally against Infectious and Inflammatory Skin and Scalp Diseases: An In-Depth Update.

Armari M, Zavattaro E, Trejo C, Galeazzi A, Grossetti A, Veronese F Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39199997 PMC: 11350673. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13080697.

References

Fluhr J, Pelosi A, LAZZERINI S, Dikstein S, Berardesca E . Differences in corneocyte surface area in pre- and post-menopausal women. Assessment with the noninvasive videomicroscopic imaging of corneocytes method (VIC) under basal conditions. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2001; 14 Suppl 1:10-6. DOI: 10.1159/000056384. View

Luebberding S, Krueger N, Kerscher M . Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women. Skin Res Technol. 2013; 20(2):127-35. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12094. View

Fox C, Nelson D, Wareham J . The timing of skin acidification in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 1998; 18(4):272-5. View

Mogensen M, Morsy H, Thrane L, Jemec G . Morphology and epidermal thickness of normal skin imaged by optical coherence tomography. Dermatology. 2008; 217(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1159/000118508. View

Firooz A, Sadr B, Babakoohi S, Sarraf-Yazdy M, Fanian F, Kazerouni-Timsar A . Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and body region. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012; 2012:386936. PMC: 3317612. DOI: 10.1100/2012/386936. View

Mizukoshi K, Akamatsu H . The investigation of the skin characteristics of males focusing on gender differences, skin perception, and skin care habits. Skin Res Technol. 2013; 19(2):91-9. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12012. View

Lammintausta K, Maibach H, Wilson D . Irritant reactivity in males and females. Contact Dermatitis. 1987; 17(5):276-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01477.x. View

Ruvolo Jr E, Stamatas G, Kollias N . Skin viscoelasticity displays site- and age-dependent angular anisotropy. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007; 20(6):313-21. DOI: 10.1159/000108147. View

Kim M, Patel R, Shinn A, Choi S, Byun H, Huh C . Evaluation of gender difference in skin type and pH. J Dermatol Sci. 2006; 41(2):153-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2005.12.001. View

10.

EHLERS C, Ivens U, Moller M, Senderovitz T, Serup J . Females have lower skin surface pH than men. A study on the surface of gender, forearm site variation, right/left difference and time of the day on the skin surface pH. Skin Res Technol. 2001; 7(2):90-4. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.70206.x. View

11.

Roh M, Han M, Kim D, Chung K . Sebum output as a factor contributing to the size of facial pores. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155(5):890-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07465.x. View

12.

Giusti F, Martella A, Bertoni L, Seidenari S . Skin barrier, hydration, and pH of the skin of infants under 2 years of age. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001; 18(2):93-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1470.2001.018002093.x. View

13.

Inoue M . Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of computer. Forensic Sci Int. 1990; 47(2):101-12. DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(90)90204-c. View

14.

Reed J, Ghadially R, Elias P . Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol. 1995; 131(10):1134-8. View

15.

Hornstra J, Hoekstra T, Serne E, Eringa E, Wijnstok N, Blom H . Homocysteine levels are inversely associated with capillary density in men, not in premenopausal women. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014; 44(3):333-40. DOI: 10.1111/eci.12240. View

16.

Chen W, Mempel M, Traidl-Hofmann C, Al Khusaei S, Ring J . Gender aspects in skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010; 24(12):1378-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03668.x. View

17.

Man M, Xin S, Song S, Cho S, Zhang X, Tu C . Variation of skin surface pH, sebum content and stratum corneum hydration with age and gender in a large Chinese population. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2009; 22(4):190-9. PMC: 2836947. DOI: 10.1159/000231524. View

18.

Liu Z, Song S, Luo W, Elias P, Man M . Sun-induced changes of stratum corneum hydration vary with age and gender in a normal Chinese population. Skin Res Technol. 2011; 18(1):22-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00536.x. View

19.

Ishikawa T, Ishikawa O, Miyachi Y . Measurement of skin elastic properties with a new suction device (I): Relationship to age, sex and the degree of obesity in normal individuals. J Dermatol. 1995; 22(10):713-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1995.tb03907.x. View

20.

Chilcott R, Farrar R . Biophysical measurements of human forearm skin in vivo: effects of site, gender, chirality and time. Skin Res Technol. 2001; 6(2):64-69. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2000.006002064.x. View