» Articles » PMID: 30173400

Death, Devices, and Double Effect

Overview
Journal HEC Forum
Date 2018 Sep 3
PMID 30173400
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Along with the growing utilization of the total artificial heart (TAH) comes a new set of ethical issues that have, surprisingly, received little attention in the literature: (1) How does one apply the criteria of irreversible cessation of circulatory function (a core concept in the Uniformed Determination of Death Act) given that a TAH rarely stops functioning on its own? (2) Can one appeal to the doctrine of double effect as an ethical rationale for turning off a TAH given that this action directly results in death? And, (3) On what ethical grounds can a physician turn off a TAH in view of the fact that either the intent of such an action or the outcome is always, and necessarily, death? The aim of this article is not to answer these questions but to highlight why these questions must be explored in some depth given the growing use of TAH technology.

References
1.
DuBois J . Non-heart-beating organ donation: a defense of the required determination of death. J Law Med Ethics. 2001; 27(2):126-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1999.tb01445.x. View

2.
Bica C . Another perspective on the doctrine of double effect. Public Aff Q. 2001; 13(2):131-9. View

3.
Sprung C, Cohen S, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow H, Hovilehto S . End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA. 2003; 290(6):790-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.6.790. View

4.
Giannini A, Pessina A, Tacchi E . End-of-life decisions in intensive care units: attitudes of physicians in an Italian urban setting. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(11):1902-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1919-4. View

5.
McIntyre A . The double life of double effect. Theor Med Bioeth. 2004; 25(1):61-74. DOI: 10.1023/b:meta.0000025095.73394.34. View