» Articles » PMID: 30169765

Pluripotent Stem Cells in Developmental Toxicity Testing: A Review of Methodological Advances

Overview
Journal Toxicol Sci
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2018 Sep 1
PMID 30169765
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Millions of children are born each year with a birth defect. Many of these defects are caused by environmental factors, although the underlying etiology is often unknown. In vivo mammalian models are frequently used to determine if a chemical poses a risk to the developing fetus. However, there are over 80 000 chemicals registered for use in the United States, many of which have undergone little safety testing, necessitating the need for higher-throughput methods to assess developmental toxicity. Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are an ideal in vitro model to investigate developmental toxicity as they possess the capacity to differentiate into nearly any cell type in the human body. Indeed, a burst of research has occurred in the field of stem cell toxicology over the past decade, which has resulted in numerous methodological advances that utilize both mouse and human PSCs, as well as cutting-edge technology in the fields of metabolomics, transcriptomics, transgenics, and high-throughput imaging. Here, we review the wide array of approaches used to detect developmental toxicants, suggest areas for further research, and highlight critical aspects of stem cell biology that should be considered when utilizing PSCs in developmental toxicity testing.

Citing Articles

Validation of a mouse 3D gastruloid-based embryotoxicity assay in reference to the ICH S5(R3) guideline chemical exposure list.

Huntsman M, Kurashima C, Marikawa Y Reprod Toxicol. 2024; 125:108558.

PMID: 38367697 PMC: 11016378. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108558.


High Accuracy Classification of Developmental Toxicants by In Vitro Tests of Human Neuroepithelial and Cardiomyoblast Differentiation.

Seidel F, Cherianidou A, Kappenberg F, Marta M, Dreser N, Blum J Cells. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36359802 PMC: 9653768. DOI: 10.3390/cells11213404.


Potential cardiotoxicity induced by Euodiae Fructus: and experiments and untargeted metabolomics research.

Zhang D, Lu J, Ren Z, Zhang X, Wu H, Sa R Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:1028046.

PMID: 36353487 PMC: 9637925. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1028046.


Developmental toxicity of remdesivir, an anti-COVID-19 drug, is implicated by in vitro assays using morphogenetic embryoid bodies of mouse and human pluripotent stem cells.

Kirkwood-Johnson L, Marikawa Y Birth Defects Res. 2022; 115(2):224-239.

PMID: 36349436 PMC: 9877128. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.2111.


The DevTox Germ Layer Reporter Platform: An Assay Adaptation of the Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Test.

Gamble J, Hopperstad K, Deisenroth C Toxics. 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35878297 PMC: 9321663. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10070392.


References
1.
Pal R, Mamidi M, Kumar Das A, Bhonde R . Diverse effects of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on the differentiation potential of human embryonic stem cells. Arch Toxicol. 2011; 86(4):651-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-011-0782-2. View

2.
Weitzer G . Embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies: an in vitro model of eutherian pregastrulation development and early gastrulation. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2005; (174):21-51. View

3.
Kugler J, Tharmann J, Chuva de Sousa Lopes S, Kemler R, Luch A, Oelgeschlager M . A Bmp Reporter Transgene Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Model as a Tool to Identify and Characterize Chemical Teratogens. Toxicol Sci. 2015; 146(2):374-85. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv103. View

4.
Chapin R, Augustine-Rauch K, Beyer B, Daston G, Finnell R, Flynn T . State of the art in developmental toxicity screening methods and a way forward: a meeting report addressing embryonic stem cells, whole embryo culture, and zebrafish. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008; 83(4):446-56. DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.20158. View

5.
Schenk B, Weimer M, Bremer S, van der Burg B, Cortvrindt R, Freyberger A . The ReProTect Feasibility Study, a novel comprehensive in vitro approach to detect reproductive toxicants. Reprod Toxicol. 2010; 30(1):200-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.05.012. View