» Articles » PMID: 30157772

Cancer Screening Inequities in a Time of Primary Care Reform: a Population-based Longitudinal Study in Ontario, Canada

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Aug 31
PMID 30157772
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario's enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born.

Methods: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles.

Results: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions.

Conclusion: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients.

Citing Articles

Initiatives to increase breast and cervical cancer-related knowledge, screening, and health behaviours among Black women.

Williams C, Goulbourne E, Gyansa E, Hashi A, Khalil I, Khan R Can J Public Health. 2024; 116(1):100-108.

PMID: 39436534 PMC: 11868473. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00953-y.


What Interventions Work to Reduce Cost Barriers to Primary Healthcare in High-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.

Yee B, Mohan N, McKenzie F, Jeffreys M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200639 PMC: 11353906. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081029.


Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol.

Li V, Alibhai S, Noel K, Fazelzad R, Haase K, Mariano C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e074191.

PMID: 38245013 PMC: 10807002. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191.


Cancer Screening Disparities Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Lofters A, Wu F, Frymire E, Kiran T, Vahabi M, Green M JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(11):e2343796.

PMID: 37983033 PMC: 10660460. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43796.


Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway.

Bhargava S, Botteri E, Berthelsen M, Iqbal N, Randel K, Holme O Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1254905.

PMID: 37822535 PMC: 10562536. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1254905.


References
1.
Kiran T, Victor J, Kopp A, Shah B, Glazier R . The relationship between financial incentives and quality of diabetes care in Ontario, Canada. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(5):1038-46. PMC: 3329816. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1402. View

2.
Borkhoff C, Saskin R, Rabeneck L, Baxter N, Liu Y, Tinmouth J . Disparities in receipt of screening tests for cancer, diabetes and high cholesterol in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study using area-based methods. Can J Public Health. 2013; 104(4):e284-90. PMC: 6973949. DOI: 10.17269/cjph.104.3699. View

3.
Kiran T, Victor J, Kopp A, Shah B, Glazier R . The relationship between primary care models and processes of diabetes care in Ontario. Can J Diabetes. 2014; 38(3):172-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.01.015. View

4.
Wilkins K, Shields M . Colorectal cancer testing in Canada--2008. Health Rep. 2009; 20(3):21-30. View

5.
Lofters A, Moineddin R, Hwang S, Glazier R . Low rates of cervical cancer screening among urban immigrants: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. Med Care. 2010; 48(7):611-8. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d6886f. View