Cancer Screening Inequities in a Time of Primary Care Reform: a Population-based Longitudinal Study in Ontario, Canada
Overview
Public Health
Affiliations
Background: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario's enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born.
Methods: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles.
Results: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions.
Conclusion: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients.
Williams C, Goulbourne E, Gyansa E, Hashi A, Khalil I, Khan R Can J Public Health. 2024; 116(1):100-108.
PMID: 39436534 PMC: 11868473. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-024-00953-y.
Yee B, Mohan N, McKenzie F, Jeffreys M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).
PMID: 39200639 PMC: 11353906. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081029.
Li V, Alibhai S, Noel K, Fazelzad R, Haase K, Mariano C BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e074191.
PMID: 38245013 PMC: 10807002. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191.
Cancer Screening Disparities Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Lofters A, Wu F, Frymire E, Kiran T, Vahabi M, Green M JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(11):e2343796.
PMID: 37983033 PMC: 10660460. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43796.
Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway.
Bhargava S, Botteri E, Berthelsen M, Iqbal N, Randel K, Holme O Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1254905.
PMID: 37822535 PMC: 10562536. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1254905.