» Articles » PMID: 30157594

Knee Examination Under Anesthesia: Development of a Predictive Score for Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Aug 30
PMID 30157594
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of knee examination under anesthesia (EUA) and develop a prognostic score for partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.

Materials And Methods: A total of 229 patients with an ACL injury were included. Knee EUA was performed using the Lachman test, pivot shift test and arthrometric maximum manual side-to-side difference (AMMD) test. The arthroscopic examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis of partial and complete ACL tears, which was compared with EUA findings. Multivariate logistic regression was estimated, and the significant variables were used to develop a predictive score.

Results: The relative risk for a complete tear with Lachman 2+ was 8.55 (range, 3.5 to 20.7) and 53.04 (range, 6.7 to 417) with Lachman 3+, compared to Lachman 1+. Negative pivot shift was reported in 23 cases in the partial tear group (76.7%) and in 22 in the complete tear group (11.1%). The AMMD was 3.5 mm in the partial tear group and 5.4 mm in the complete tear group (p<0.05). A prognostic score of less than five suggested the presence of a partial ACL tear. The score showed 81.1% sensitivity and 68.7% specificity.

Conclusions: Partial ACL tears can be differentiated from complete tears with Lachman test, pivot shift test, and AMMD test.

Citing Articles

The pre-anesthetic period is the best time to evaluate the knee flexion angle for predicting the flexion angle after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study.

Ruangsomboon P, Pornrattanamaneewong C, Santanapipatkul P, Sarirasririd S, Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281237.

PMID: 36735740 PMC: 9897552. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281237.


Outpatient-based diagnostic criteria for partial ACL injury: clinical outcomes of non-operative treatment and radiographic predictor.

Moon H, Choi C, Kim S, Yoo J, Jung M, Kwon H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(4):2027-2036.

PMID: 35552802 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04467-5.


Is it worth to perform initial non-operative treatment for patients with acute ACL injury?: a prospective cohort prognostic study.

Park Y, Ha C, Park Y, Na S, Kim M, Kim T Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1):11.

PMID: 33823937 PMC: 8025569. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00094-3.

References
1.
Sonnery-Cottet B, Lavoie F, Ogassawara R, Scussiato R, Kidder J, Chambat P . Selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tears: a series of 36 patients with mean 24 months follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 18(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0855-4. View

2.
Nakamae A, Ochi M, Deie M, Adachi N, Kanaya A, Nishimori M . Biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament remnants: how long do they contribute to knee stability after injury in patients with complete tears?. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26(12):1577-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.04.076. View

3.
Bach Jr B, Warren R, Flynn W, Kroll M, Wickiewiecz T . Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(9):1299-306. View

4.
Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos P, Saggin P, Panisset J . The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(3):491-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.013. View

5.
Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A . Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(4):463.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.034. View