» Articles » PMID: 30157518

Consumer Health Informatics Adoption Among Underserved Populations: Thinking Beyond the Digital Divide

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2018 Aug 30
PMID 30157518
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives:  Underserved populations can benefit from consumer health informatics (CHI) that promotes self-management at a lower cost. However, prior literature suggested that the digital divide and low motivation constituted barriers to CHI adoption. Despite increased Internet use, underserved populations continue to show slow CHI uptake. The aim of the paper is to revisit barriers and facilitators that may impact CHI adoption among underserved populations.

Methods:  We surveyed the past five years of literature. We searched PubMed for articles published between 2012 and 2017 that describe empirical evaluations involving CHI use by underserved populations. We abstracted and summarized data about facilitators and barriers impacting CHI adoption.

Results:  From 645 search results, after abstract and full-text screening, 13 publications met the inclusion criteria of identifying barriers to and facilitators of underserved populations' CHI adoption. Contrary to earlier literature, the studies suggested that the motivation to improve health literacy and adopt technology was high among studied populations. Beyond the digital divide, barriers included: low health and computer literacy, challenges in accepting the presented information, poor usability, and unclear content. Factors associated with increased use were: user needs for information, user-access mediated by a proxy person, and early user engagement in system design.

Conclusions:  While the digital divide remains a barrier, newer studies show that high motivation for CHI use exists. However, simply gaining access to technology is not sufficient to improve adoption unless CHI technology is tailored to address user needs. Future interventions should consider building larger empirical evidence on identifying CHI barriers and facilitators.

Citing Articles

Centering equity, diversity, and inclusion in youth digital mental health: findings from a research, policy, and practice knowledge exchange workshop.

Adu M, Banire B, Dockrill M, Ilie A, Lappin E, McGrath P Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1449129.

PMID: 39544986 PMC: 11560888. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1449129.


Community Health Worker Videoconferencing Interventions for Disease Management and Health Promotion: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

France S, Dettori A, Ekici S, McKinley L, Patel S, Jewell T JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e55160.

PMID: 39509149 PMC: 11582480. DOI: 10.2196/55160.


Sociodemographic factors and health digital divide among urban residents: Evidence from a population-based survey in China.

Yang Y, Ma C Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241271812.

PMID: 39114114 PMC: 11304494. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241271812.


Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.

Atherton H, Eccles A, Poltawski L, Dale J, Campbell J, Abel G J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51931.

PMID: 38976870 PMC: 11263895. DOI: 10.2196/51931.


Construction of the Digital Health Equity-Focused Implementation Research Conceptual Model - Bridging the Divide Between Equity-focused Digital Health and Implementation Research.

Groom L, Schoenthaler A, Mann D, Brody A PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(5):e0000509.

PMID: 38776354 PMC: 11111026. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000509.


References
1.
Chang B, Bakken S, Brown S, Houston T, Kreps G, Kukafka R . Bridging the digital divide: reaching vulnerable populations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(6):448-57. PMC: 524624. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1535. View

2.
Davis K, Schoenbaum S, Audet A . A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(10):953-7. PMC: 1490238. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0178.x. View

3.
Bevan J, Pecchioni L . Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71(3):356-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.022. View

4.
Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S . Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009; (175):1-1422. PMC: 4781044. View

5.
Grant M, Booth A . A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. View