» Articles » PMID: 30155368

Comparative Analysis of Whole Flower Transcriptomes in the Zingiberales

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2018 Aug 30
PMID 30155368
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The advancement of next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) has revolutionized our ability to generate large quantities of data at a genomic scale. Despite great challenges, these new sequencing technologies have empowered scientists to explore various relevant biological questions on non-model organisms, even in the absence of a complete sequenced reference genome. Here, we analyzed whole flower transcriptome libraries from exemplar species across the monocot order Zingiberales, using a comparative approach in order to gain insight into the evolution of the molecular mechanisms underlying flower development in the group. We identified 4,153 coding genes shared by all floral transcriptomes analyzed, and 1,748 genes that are only retrieved in the Zingiberales. We also identified 666 genes that are unique to the ginger lineage, and 2,001 that are only found in the banana group, while in the outgroup species J.C. Mikan (Commelinaceae) we retrieved 2,686 unique genes. It is possible that some of these genes underlie lineage-specific molecular mechanisms of floral diversification. We further discuss the nature of these lineage-specific datasets, emphasizing conserved and unique molecular processes with special emphasis in the Zingiberales. We also briefly discuss the strengths and shortcomings of assembly for the study of developmental processes across divergent taxa from a particular order. Although this comparison is based exclusively on coding genes, with particular emphasis in transcription factors, we believe that the careful study of other regulatory mechanisms, such as non-coding RNAs, might reveal new levels of complexity, which were not explored in this work.

Citing Articles

Transcriptomics of the Rooibos () Species Complex.

Stander E, Williams W, Mgwatyu Y, van Heusden P, Rautenbach F, Marnewick J BioTech (Basel). 2022; 9(4).

PMID: 35822822 PMC: 9258316. DOI: 10.3390/biotech9040019.


Metabolic and Transcriptomic Profiling of Leaves Infected With Reveals Different Stages of Plant Defense Mechanisms.

Chai N, Xu J, Zuo R, Sun Z, Cheng Y, Sui S Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:730620.

PMID: 34630478 PMC: 8493297. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.730620.


Differential Gene Expression with an Emphasis on Floral Organ Size Differences in Natural and Synthetic Polyploids of (Solanaceae).

Landis J, Kurti A, Lawhorn A, Litt A, McCarthy E Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(9).

PMID: 32961813 PMC: 7563459. DOI: 10.3390/genes11091097.

References
1.
Chanderbali A, Yoo M, Zahn L, Brockington S, Wall P, Gitzendanner M . Conservation and canalization of gene expression during angiosperm diversification accompany the origin and evolution of the flower. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(52):22570-5. PMC: 3012471. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1013395108. View

2.
Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M . RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 10(1):57-63. PMC: 2949280. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2484. View

3.
Rocha de Almeida A, Yockteng R, Specht C . Evolution of petaloidy in the zingiberales: An assessment of the relationship between ultrastructure and gene expression patterns. Dev Dyn. 2015; 244(9):1121-1132. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24280. View

4.
Champagne K, Kutateladze T . Structural insight into histone recognition by the ING PHD fingers. Curr Drug Targets. 2009; 10(5):432-41. PMC: 2740728. DOI: 10.2174/138945009788185040. View

5.
Yockteng R, Almeida A, Morioka K, Alvarez-Buylla E, Specht C . Molecular evolution and patterns of duplication in the SEP/AGL6-like lineage of the Zingiberales: a proposed mechanism for floral diversification. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30(11):2401-22. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst137. View