» Articles » PMID: 30152841

Management of Stable Angina Pectoris in Private Healthcare Settings in South Africa

Overview
Date 2018 Aug 29
PMID 30152841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Angina pectoris continues to affect multitudes of people around the world. In this study the management of stable angina pectoris in private healthcare settings in South Africa (SA) was investigated. In particular, we reviewed the frequency of medical versus surgical interventions when used as first-line therapy.

Methods: This was a retrospective inferential study carried out using records of patients in private healthcare settings. All cases that were authorised for reimbursement by medical aid schemes for revascularisation between 2009 and 2014 were retrieved and a database was created. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism version 5. The differences (where applicable) were considered statistically significant if the -value was ≤ 0.05.

Results: Nine hundred and twenty-two patients, consisting of 585 males (average age 64.7 years; SD 12.9) and 337 females (average age 65.5 years; SD 14.3), met the inclusion criteria. One hundred and seventy-eighty or 54%, 156 (43%) and 86 (63%) patients with hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes, respectively, were treated with surgery only. For these patients, percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) were significantly ( < 0.0001) preferred first-line interventions over optimal medical therapy (OMT). Four hundred and thirty-six or 47% of all patients studied were managed with surgery only, while only 25% (227) were managed with OMT. It took 60 months (five years) for patients who were treated with OMT before their first surgical intervention(s) to require the second revascularisation. About 71% of patients who received medical therapy were placed on only one drug, the so called sub-optimal medical therapy (SOMT).

Conclusions: The management of stable angina pectoris in private healthcare settings in SA is skewed towards surgical interventions as opposed to OMT. This is contrary to what consistent scientific evidence and international treatment guidelines suggest.

References
1.
Malhotra A . The whole truth about coronary stents: the elephant in the room. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174(8):1367-8. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9190. View

2.
Foucrier A, Rodseth R, Aissaoui M, Ibanes C, Goarin J, Landais P . The long-term impact of early cardiovascular therapy intensification for postoperative troponin elevation after major vascular surgery. Anesth Analg. 2014; 119(5):1053-63. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000302. View

3.
Bodenheimer T . The American health care system--the movement for improved quality in health care. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(6):488-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400621. View

4.
. Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial. Lancet. 2002; 359(9314):1269-75. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08265-X. View

5.
Pepine C, Wolff A . A controlled trial with a novel anti-ischemic agent, ranolazine, in chronic stable angina pectoris that is responsive to conventional antianginal agents. Ranolazine Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84(1):46-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00190-3. View