» Articles » PMID: 30151485

MR-Imaging of Meniscal Substitution

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Radiology
Date 2018 Aug 29
PMID 30151485
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

More than a century ago, the menisci were considered to be the functionless remains of a leg muscle. Gradually the usefulness and function of the meniscus was investigated and proven, and the link between total meniscectomy, radiographic osteoarthritis and reduced knee function was made. Subsequently, partial meniscectomy was introduced in the clinical practice. However, the frequency of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis was not substantially lowered. Therefore, meniscal repair was introduced for younger individuals with traumatic meniscus lesions with a good healing potential. Later on in the development process, the quest for meniscal replacement strategies arose. The introduction of allogenic, xenogenic and artificial materials followed in research and clinical settings. Nowadays, a lot of research is conducted on meniscal substitutes, because meniscal injuries are a very common problem in the general population. The imaging of the meniscus is running parallel to this evolution. With the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the meniscus could be perfectly visualized. A lot of studies were published on imaging of the normal meniscus, and subsequently meniscal pathology on MRI was investigated. In the current literature, a growing number of papers describe the MRI findings in artificial meniscus replacements.

Citing Articles

Device Design and Advanced Computed Tomography of 3D Printed Radiopaque Composite Scaffolds and Meniscus.

Delemeester M, Pawelec K, Hix J, Siegenthaler J, Lissy M, Douek P Adv Funct Mater. 2024; 34(44).

PMID: 39619322 PMC: 11606576. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202404860.


Are the Biological and Biomechanical Properties of Meniscal Scaffolds Reflected in Clinical Practice? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Ranmuthu C, Ranmuthu C, Russell J, Singhania D, Khan W Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(3).

PMID: 30717200 PMC: 6386938. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030632.


Belgian Radiology Research in Full Power!.

Vanhoenacker P J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018; 101(1):13.

PMID: 30039005 PMC: 5854336. DOI: 10.5334/jbr-btr.1240.

References
1.
De Coninck T, Huysse W, Willemot L, Verdonk R, Verstraete K, Verdonk P . Two-year follow-up study on clinical and radiological outcomes of polyurethane meniscal scaffolds. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 41(1):64-72. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512463344. View

2.
Hutchinson I, Moran C, Potter H, Warren R, Rodeo S . Restoration of the meniscus: form and function. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 42(4):987-98. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513498503. View

3.
Tienen T, Heijkants R, de Groot J, Pennings A, Schouten A, Veth R . Replacement of the knee meniscus by a porous polymer implant: a study in dogs. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 34(1):64-71. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505280905. View

4.
Hoben G, Athanasiou K . Meniscal repair with fibrocartilage engineering. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2006; 14(3):129-37. DOI: 10.1097/00132585-200609000-00004. View

5.
Potter H, Rodeo S, Wickiewicz T, Warren R . MR imaging of meniscal allografts: correlation with clinical and arthroscopic outcomes. Radiology. 1996; 198(2):509-14. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596858. View