» Articles » PMID: 30147737

Vascular Ultrasound, the Potential of Integration of Multiparametric Ultrasound into Routine Clinical Practice

Overview
Journal Ultrasound
Date 2018 Aug 28
PMID 30147737
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound has traditionally been regarded as the first-line imaging modality for screening, diagnostic evaluation and monitoring treatment and disease progression of vascular pathology, including both the arterial and the venous branch of the vascular system. Albeit of its well-tolerated nature, wide availability and low cost, ultrasound above all, has the advantage of providing the clinician with clinically significant information related to both intraluminal irregularities and extravascular disease. Ultrasound has the potential not only to anatomically describe tissues but also to assess physiology by evaluating blood flow characteristics in real time.

Discussion: The already fundamental role of ultrasound has been even more expanded with the introduction of newer techniques like contrast-enhanced ultrasound, tissue-elastography and 3D ultrasound and the incorporation of research advances into clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to present and discuss some of the latest advances in the field of vascular ultrasound in attempt to illustrate how the adoption of multiparametric ultrasound into everyday clinical practice could address the patient's needs. Pathology and applications discussed include carotid and aortic disease, portal and peripheral venous abnormalities.

Conclusion: Widespread availability of modern technology in ultrasound devices has made the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, tissue elastography and 3D ultrasound feasible options, ready to contribute to the diagnostic performance of the ultrasonographic technique.

Citing Articles

Impact of BMI on Recovery and Quality of Life Post-Revascularization in Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients.

Nowaczyk A, Cwajda-Bialasik J, Szewczyk M Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e946793.

PMID: 39702955 PMC: 11667945. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946793.


Multiparametric ultrasound for upper extremity dialysis access evaluation.

Michas V, Taghipour M, Papachristodoulou A, Sidiropoulou M, Partovi S, Cokkinos D Ultrasonography. 2023; 42(4):490-507.

PMID: 37723649 PMC: 10555685. DOI: 10.14366/usg.23064.


Standardized pre-procedural clinical workup for protected percutaneous coronary intervention.

Al-Rashid F, Van Mieghem N, Bonello L, Oreglia J, Romagnoli E Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022; 24(Suppl J):J11-J16.

PMID: 36518895 PMC: 9730791. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac061.


The effect of smoking on quantification of aortic stiffness by ultrasound time-harmonic elastography.

Elgeti T, Frohlich M, Wismayer K, Tzschatzsch H, Hamm B, Sack I Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):17759.

PMID: 36273020 PMC: 9588008. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22638-7.


Advances in vascular anatomy and pathophysiology using high resolution and multiparametric sonography.

Ilaria P, Mario M, Ilaria F J Vasc Access. 2021; 22(1_suppl):1-8.

PMID: 34338066 PMC: 8606621. DOI: 10.1177/11297298211020150.


References
1.
Tarantino L, Ambrosino P, Di Minno M . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating malignant from benign portal vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(32):9457-60. PMC: 4548106. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i32.9457. View

2.
Gargiulo M, Gallitto E, Serra C, Freyrie A, Mascoli C, Bianchini Massoni C . Could four-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound replace computed tomography angiography during follow up of fenestrated endografts? Results of a preliminary experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014; 48(5):536-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.05.025. View

3.
Rafailidis V, Charitanti A, Tegos T, Destanis E, Chryssogonidis I . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the carotid system: a review of the current literature. J Ultrasound. 2017; 20(2):97-109. PMC: 5440332. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-017-0239-4. View

4.
Stickel M, Johnson T, Glaser C, Clevert D, Steitz H, Kopp R . Imaging of aortic abnormalities with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A pictorial comparison with CT. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(11):2991-3000. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0542-5. View

5.
Guo Q, Zhao J, Huang B, Yuan D, Yang Y, Zeng G . A Systematic Review of Ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Computed Tomography for Endoleak Detection and Aneurysm Diameter Measurement After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016; 23(6):936-943. DOI: 10.1177/1526602816664878. View