Utility and Limitations of Noninvasive Fibrosis Markers for Predicting Prognosis in Biopsy-proven Japanese Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Aim: The fibrosis stage of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely associated with long-term prognosis, including liver-related mortality. However, it is not yet clear whether noninvasive fibrosis markers can predict the incidence of non-liver-related complications in Japanese NAFLD. In this study, we clarified the prognosis of NAFLD patients, including non-liver-related diseases, based on hepatic pathology and noninvasive fibrosis markers.
Methods: A total of 246 Japanese patients with NAFLD diagnosed by liver biopsy were enrolled. We investigated their prognosis based on hepatic pathology and noninvasive fibrosis markers.
Results: When these patients were categorized based on the severity of liver fibrosis as F0-2 (n = 196) and F3-4 (n = 50), the patients with F3-4 had significantly poorer prognosis in overall survival rates and all complications (P < 0.05). The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index was useful to predict overall survival and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis (LC)-related complications but not extrahepatic malignancies. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following risk factors: total bilirubin ≥ 1.2 (hazard ratio [HR] 6.362, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.393-29.052) and severe liver fibrosis (HR 6.512, 95% CI 1.433-29.592) for overall survival; liver fibrosis (F3-4) (HR 13.370, 95% CI 2.775-64.427) for hepatocellular carcinoma; FIB-4 index (HR 26.560, 95% CI 3.320-212.494) for LC-related complications, and liver inflammation (A2-3) (HR 4.214, 95% CI 1.354-13.116) for extrahepatic malignancies.
Conclusions: Severe liver fibrosis was associated not only with the hepatocarcinogenesis and LC-related complications but also with extrahepatic malignancies. The FIB-4 index was useful for predicting liver-related diseases but had limitations in predicting extrahepatic malignancies.
Yokoyama S, Muto H, Honda T, Kurokawa Y, Ogawa H, Nakajima R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).
PMID: 39201613 PMC: 11354866. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168927.
Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical aspects of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MAFLD patients.
Argenziano M, Kim M, Montori M, Di Bucchianico A, Balducci D, Ahn S Hepatol Int. 2024; 18(Suppl 2):922-940.
PMID: 39012579 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10692-4.
Motta B, Masarone M, Torre P, Persico M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).
PMID: 38001718 PMC: 10670704. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225458.
Perspectives on the Underlying Etiology of HCC and Its Effects on Treatment Outcomes.
Ito T, Nguyen M J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023; 10:413-428.
PMID: 36926055 PMC: 10013586. DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S347959.
Noninvasive serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis in NAFLD: current and future.
Reinson T, Buchanan R, Byrne C Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022; 29(Suppl):S157-S170.
PMID: 36417894 PMC: 10029954. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0348.