» Articles » PMID: 30142224

Descriptive and Multivariate Analysis of the Pig Sector in Georgia and Its Implications for Disease Transmission

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Aug 25
PMID 30142224
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Georgia is a country in the Caucasus region with a traditional backyard and highly variable pig farming system. The practices of such sectors have seldom been described and analyzed to better understand their implication in the introduction and spread of infectious pig diseases. Moreover, the Georgian pig sector was badly hit by an epidemic of African swine fever in 2007 that quickly spread throughout the region.

Materials And Methods: We interviewed 487 pig farmers and 116 butchers using closed questionnaires on socioeconomic issues related to pig production, husbandry practices, biosecurity, marketing and movements, and disease awareness. Surveys were conducted in four regions of Georgia and descriptive statistics were computed. Factorial analyses of mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components were applied to study the relationship among collected variables for both farmers and butchers.

Results: Results show that pig farming in Georgia is a non-professional sector, highly heterogeneous by region, characterized by smallholdings of few animals, with low inputs, outdated technologies, and poor biosecurity, which all translates into low outputs and productivity. The hierarchical clustering on principal components confirmed that there are five major production and husbandry strategies, which match the four regions where the study was conducted.

Conclusions: Our results are the first step to quantify biosecurity gaps and risky behaviours, develop risk profiles, and identify critical control points across the market chain where to implement mitigation measures. This study provides the baseline information needed to design realistic and sustainable prevention, surveillance and control strategies.

Citing Articles

A combined methodological approach to characterize pig farming and its influence on the occurrence of interactions between wild boars and domestic pigs in Corsican micro-regions.

Dupon L, Trabucco B, Munoz F, Casabianca F, Charrier F, Laval M Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1253060.

PMID: 38628940 PMC: 11019438. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1253060.


Improving Agri-environmental Schemes: Suggestions from Farmers and Nature Managers in a Central European Region.

Zindler M, Haensel M, Fricke U, Schmitt T, Tobisch C, Koellner T Environ Manage. 2023; 73(4):826-840.

PMID: 38108828 PMC: 10972928. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01922-w.


Network analysis of pig movement data as an epidemiological tool: an Austrian case study.

Puspitarani G, Fuchs R, Fuchs K, Ladinig A, Desvars-Larrive A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9623.

PMID: 37316653 PMC: 10267221. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36596-1.


Innovative Research Offers New Hope for Managing African Swine Fever Better in Resource-Limited Smallholder Farming Settings: A Timely Update.

Penrith M, van Heerden J, Pfeiffer D, Olsevskis E, Depner K, Chenais E Pathogens. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36839627 PMC: 9963711. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020355.


Network analysis of live pig movements in North Macedonia: Pathways for disease spread.

OHara K, Beltran-Alcrudo D, Hovari M, Tabakovski B, Martinez-Lopez B Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:922412.

PMID: 36016804 PMC: 9396142. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.922412.


References
1.
Kukielka E, Martinez-Lopez B, Beltran-Alcrudo D . Modeling the live-pig trade network in Georgia: Implications for disease prevention and control. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178904. PMC: 5466301. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178904. View

2.
Raymond P, Bellehumeur C, Nagarajan M, Longtin D, Ferland A, Muller P . Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) in pig meat. Can J Vet Res. 2017; 81(3):162-170. PMC: 5508380. View

3.
Truong V, Gummow B . Risk factors for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreaks in Vietnamese small stock farms. N Z Vet J. 2014; 62(4):199-207. DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2014.888640. View

4.
Jori F, Relun A, Trabucco B, Charrier F, Maestrini O, Chavernac D . Questionnaire-Based Assessment of Wild Boar/Domestic Pig Interactions and Implications for Disease Risk Management in Corsica. Front Vet Sci. 2017; 4:198. PMC: 5716975. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00198. View

5.
Herrera-Ibata D, Martinez-Lopez B, Quijada D, Burton K, Mur L . Quantitative approach for the risk assessment of African swine fever and Classical swine fever introduction into the United States through legal imports of pigs and swine products. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0182850. PMC: 5552331. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182850. View