» Articles » PMID: 30140328

An Assessment of Clinically Important Differences on the Worst Pain Severity Item of the Modified Brief Pain Inventory in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Overview
Journal Pain Res Manag
Date 2018 Aug 25
PMID 30140328
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Using patient global impression of change (PGIC) as an anchor, an approximately 30% reduction on an 11-point numeric pain intensity rating scale (PI-NRS) is considered a clinically important difference (CID) in pain. Our objective was to define the CID for another pain measure, the worst pain severity (WPS) item of the modified Brief Pain Inventory (m-BPI).

Methods: In this post hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, 452 randomized patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) were followed over 5 weeks, with m-BPI data collected weekly and PGIC at treatment conclusion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (via logistic regression) were used to determine the changes in the m-BPI-WPS score that best predicted ordinal clinical improvement thresholds (i.e., "minimally improved" or better) on the PGIC.

Results: Similar to the PI-NRS, a change of -3 (raw) or -33.3% from the baseline on the m-BPI-WPS optimized prediction for the "much improved" or better PGIC threshold and represents a CID. There was a high correspondence between observed and predicted PGIC categories at each PGIC threshold (ROC AUCs were 0.78-0.82).

Conclusions: Worst pain on the m-BPI may be used to assess clinically important improvements in DPNP studies. Findings require validation in larger studies.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin (HSK16149) in Adults with Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhang D, Lei T, Qin L, Li C, Lin X, Wang H JAMA Dermatol. 2024; 160(11):1182-1191.

PMID: 39320907 PMC: 11581609. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3410.


Pilot RCT comparing low-dose naltrexone, gabapentin and placebo to reduce pain among people with HIV with alcohol problems.

Tsui J, Rossi S, Cheng D, Bendiks S, Vetrova M, Blokhina E PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297948.

PMID: 38408060 PMC: 10896547. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297948.


A meta-epidemiological study on the reported treatment effect of pregabalin in neuropathic pain trials over time.

Cheng E, Cheik-Hussein M, Lin N, Lewin A, McAuley J, Harris I PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280593.

PMID: 36662848 PMC: 9858874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280593.


Virtual reality for improving pain and pain-related symptoms in patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer: A pilot trial to test feasibility and acceptability.

Kelleher S, Fisher H, Winger J, Miller S, Amaden G, Somers T Palliat Support Care. 2022; 20(4):471-481.

PMID: 35078545 PMC: 9314453. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951521002017.


Effect of perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy on chronic post-surgical pain among breast cancer patients with high pain catastrophising characteristics: protocol for a double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Moorthy A, Lowry D, Edgley C, Casey M, Buggy D Trials. 2022; 23(1):66.

PMID: 35062997 PMC: 8781049. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06019-z.


References
1.
Vinik A, Rosenstock J, Sharma U, Feins K, Hsu C, Merante D . Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin (DS-5565) for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, adaptive proof-of-concept phase 2 study. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(12):3253-61. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1044. View

2.
Dworkin R, OConnor A, Audette J, Baron R, Gourlay G, Haanpaa M . Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: an overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85(3 Suppl):S3-14. PMC: 2844007. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0649. View

3.
Zelman D, Gore M, Dukes E, Tai K, Brandenburg N . Validation of a modified version of the brief pain inventory for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005; 29(4):401-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.06.018. View

4.
Schneider E, Ziegler D, Wilhelm S, Schacht A, Birklein F . Patient expectations in the treatment of painful diabetic polyneuropathy: results from a non-interventional study. Pain Med. 2014; 15(4):671-81. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12363. View

5.
King M . A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011; 11(2):171-84. DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.9. View