» Articles » PMID: 30138345

Age-related Differences in the Clinical Features of Ocular Sarcoidosis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Aug 24
PMID 30138345
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The distribution of age at diagnosis in ocular sarcoidosis has shifted towards the older age groups in developed countries. In systemic sarcoidosis, age-related differences in the clinical presentation, which reflect the therapeutic strategies, was reported. We retrospectively compared 100 consecutive patients from April 2010 to March 2016 who were initially diagnosed with ocular sarcoidosis by International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis criteria. They were classified into elder (>65 years: 50 patients) and younger (≤65 years: 50 patients) groups by the age at diagnosis of uveitis associated with sarcoidosis. All patients received ophthalmic examination to assess the presence of seven intraocular signs and 4 laboratory parameters. Significantly fewer ocular signs (2.8 ± 1.5 and 3.6 ± 1.5; P = 0.0034) and abnormal laboratory results (1.5 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 1.2; P = 0.023) were detected in the elder group than in the younger group; statistical differences were found between the groups regarding the frequencies of mutton-fat keratic precipitates (40% and 64%; P = 0.012), vitreous opacities (60% and 78%; P = 0.0059), bilateral inflammation (64% and 80%; P = 0.012), and bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy between the groups (52% and 78%; P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed negative correlations between age and number of detected ocular signs (r = -0.36, P < 0.001) and laboratory results (r = -0.20, P = 0.023). The characteristic ocular signs and abnormal laboratory results had a lower frequency in the elder patients compared with the younger patients. Probable or possible ocular sarcoidosis by the international criteria should increase with increased life expectancy in developed countries.

Citing Articles

Ocular sarcoidosis in adults and children: update on clinical manifestation and diagnosis.

Bazewicz M, Heissigerova J, Pavesio C, Willermain F, Skrzypecki J J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2023; 13(1):41.

PMID: 37721575 PMC: 10507006. DOI: 10.1186/s12348-023-00364-z.


Clinical features and visual outcomes of ocular sarcoidosis at a tertiary referral center in Tokyo.

Nagahori K, Keino H, Nakayama M, Watanabe T, Ando Y, Hayashi I Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022; 260(10):3357-3363.

PMID: 35616725 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05701-x.


Progress in the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis.

OKeefe G, Rao N Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022; 70(4):1121-1129.

PMID: 35325997 PMC: 9240545. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2830_21.


Clinical Features of Japanese Patients with Ocular Inflammation and Their Surgical Procedures Over the Course of 20 Years.

Takai N, Kobayashi T, Kida T, Ikeda T Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14:2799-2806.

PMID: 33061264 PMC: 7522428. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S273938.

References
1.
Smith J, Chan C, Egwuagu C, Whitcup S . Immunohistochemical examination of lacrimal gland tissue from patients with ocular sarcoidosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998; 438:599-602. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5359-5_84. View

2.
Cozier Y, Berman J, Palmer J, Boggs D, Wise L, Rosenberg L . Reproductive and hormonal factors in relation to incidence of sarcoidosis in US Black women: The Black Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 176(7):635-41. PMC: 3530373. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws145. View

3.
Herbort C, Rao N, Mochizuki M . International criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis: results of the first International Workshop On Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS). Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2009; 17(3):160-9. DOI: 10.1080/09273940902818861. View

4.
Hunninghake G, Crystal R . Pulmonary sarcoidosis: a disorder mediated by excess helper T-lymphocyte activity at sites of disease activity. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305(8):429-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198108203050804. View

5.
Newman L, Rose C, Bresnitz E, Rossman M, Barnard J, Frederick M . A case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis: environmental and occupational risk factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004; 170(12):1324-30. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200402-249OC. View