» Articles » PMID: 30135823

Attitudes Towards Digital Treatment for Depression: A European Stakeholder Survey

Abstract

Background: The integration of digital treatments into national mental health services is on the agenda in the European Union. The E-COMPARED consortium conducted a survey aimed at exploring stakeholders' knowledge, acceptance and expectations of digital treatments for depression, and at identifying factors that might influence their opinions when considering the implementation of these approaches.

Method: An online survey was conducted in eight European countries: France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and The United Kingdom. Organisations representing government bodies, care providers, service-users, funding/insurance bodies, technical developers and researchers were invited to participate in the survey. The participating countries and organisations reflect the diversity in health care infrastructures and e-health implementation across Europe.

Results: A total of 764 organisations were invited to the survey during the period March-June 2014, with 175 of these organisations participating in our survey. The participating stakeholders reported moderate knowledge of digital treatments and considered cost-effectiveness to be the primary incentive for integration into care services. Low feasibility of delivery within existing care services was considered to be a primary barrier. Digital treatments were regarded more suitable for milder forms of depression. Stakeholders showed greater acceptability towards blended treatment (the integration of face-to-face and internet sessions within the same treatment protocol) compared to standalone internet treatments. Organisations in countries with developed e-health solutions reported greater knowledge and acceptability of digital treatments.

Conclusion: Mental health stakeholders in Europe are aware of the potential benefits of digital interventions. However, there are variations between countries and stakeholders in terms of level of knowledge about such interventions and their feasibility within routine care services. The high acceptance of blended treatments is an interesting finding that indicates a gradual integration of technology into clinical practice may fit the attitudes and needs of stakeholders. The potential of the blended treatment approach, in terms of enhancing acceptance of digital treatment while retaining the benefit of cost-effectiveness in delivery, should be further explored.

Funding: The E-COMPARED project has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 603098.

Citing Articles

A qualitative analysis of healthcare professionals' experiences with an internet-based emotion regulation intervention added to acute psychiatric inpatient care.

Bielinski L, Walchli G, Lange A, von Kanel E, Demel L, Nissen C BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):955.

PMID: 39731056 PMC: 11674089. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06365-z.


From research to routine care: A historical review of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for adult mental health problems in Sweden.

Vernmark K, Buhrman M, Carlbring P, Hedman-Lagerlof E, Kaldo V, Andersson G Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241287059.

PMID: 39381804 PMC: 11459524. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241287059.


Experts' views on the implementation of digital interventions for eating disorders: a Delphi study.

Lemmer D, Mayer G, Schrader P, Michelsen I, Friederich H, Bauer S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2486.

PMID: 39267038 PMC: 11396553. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19989-3.


Implementation of an internet-based stress management program in micro- and small-sized enterprises: a study protocol for a pre-post feasibility study of the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial.

Sasaki N, Shimazu T, Takeno H, Ogawa S, Sawada U, Tsutsumi A Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):56.

PMID: 38581058 PMC: 10996202. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01481-9.


An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.

Lattie E, Stiles-Shields C, Graham A Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 1(2):87-100.

PMID: 38515434 PMC: 10956902. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1.


References
1.
Hadjistavropoulos H, Nugent M, Alberts N, Staples L, Dear B, Titov N . Transdiagnostic Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy in Canada: An open trial comparing results of a specialized online clinic and nonspecialized community clinics. J Anxiety Disord. 2016; 42:19-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.05.006. View

2.
Andersson G, Topooco N, Havik O, Nordgreen T . Internet-supported versus face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for depression. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015; 16(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1125783. View

3.
Hadjistavropoulos H, Pugh N, Nugent M, Hesser H, Andersson G, Ivanov M . Therapist-assisted Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for depression and anxiety: translating evidence into clinical practice. J Anxiety Disord. 2014; 28(8):884-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.018. View

4.
Kemmeren L, van Schaik D, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Bosmans J, Smit J . Effectiveness of blended depression treatment for adults in specialised mental healthcare: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16:113. PMC: 4839153. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0818-5. View

5.
Kleiboer A, Smit J, Bosmans J, Ruwaard J, Andersson G, Topooco N . European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Trials. 2016; 17(1):387. PMC: 4972947. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1. View