» Articles » PMID: 30135666

Predictors of Respiratory Protective Equipment Use in the Norwegian Smelter Industry: The Role of the Theory of Planned Behavior, Safety Climate, and Work Experience in Understanding Protective Behavior

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Aug 24
PMID 30135666
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has revealed a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms in Norwegian smelter workers compared to average population controls. Nevertheless, respiratory protective equipment (RPE) is not always used, even in situations with high exposure risk. A questionnaire was distributed to workers in the Norwegian smelting industry to investigate the relationship between psychological factors and self-reported use of RPEs. Response rate was 567/1,253. A scale measuring (), (), (), and () was constructed based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (). Reliability and Confirmatory Factor Analyses partially supported the theoretical structure of the -based scale, the Work Experience Measurement Scale (WEMS) and the Short Scale for Safety Climate (SC). A model explaining the relationship between observed variables, latent constructs from , WEMS and SC was developed by SEM-analysis. Significant influence on from (β = 0.31 < 0.01) (β = 0.36 < 0.01), and (β = 0.19, < 0.01) emerged. Among the observed variables included, relationship status (β = -0.12 < 0.05), education level (β = 0.09, < 0.05), previously completed respirator fit-testing (β = -0.09, < 0.05) and average hours spent in exposed areas (β = -0.09) < 0.05) had significant influence on behavioral intention. The model explained 48% of the variance in and significantly predicted , with β = 0.65 and β = -0.06, respectively. Results of this investigation can help facilitate further work and development of health & safety routines within industrial settings.

Citing Articles

Research on the mechanism of human-machine security collaboration of miners considering automation trust.

Yang J, Yang X, Chai S, Ni L, Wang X, Pan L Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e39456.

PMID: 39687112 PMC: 11648194. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39456.


Examining the Roles of Training, Fit Testing, and Safety Climate on User Confidence in Respiratory Protection: A Case Example with Reusable Respirators in Health Delivery Settings.

Edirisooriya M, Haas E Sustainability. 2024; 15(17).

PMID: 39070029 PMC: 11274855. DOI: 10.3390/su151712822.


Self-reported exposure to dust and diesel exhaust, respiratory symptoms, and use of respiratory protective equipment among Arctic miners.

Peyre-Costa D, Stjernbrandt A, Wahlstrom J, Ikaheimo T, Hoper A Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024; 83(1):2343125.

PMID: 38626426 PMC: 11022915. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2343125.


EXPLORING PERCEPTIONS of U.S. Healthcare & Public Safety Workers at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Haas E, Casey M, Furek A, Moore S Prof Saf. 2023; 67(5):16-21.

PMID: 37200832 PMC: 10191144.


Using Public Feedback about the use of Elastomeric Half Mask Respirators to Inform a National Deployment Study within Health Settings.

Haas E, Greenawald L, Furek A, DAlessandro M J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2023; 38(2):92-106.

PMID: 37200736 PMC: 10191103.


References
1.
Clarke S . The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. J Occup Health Psychol. 2006; 11(4):315-27. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315. View

2.
Fugas C, Silva S, Melia J . Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms. Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 45:468-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.013. View

3.
Schenker M, Orenstein M, Samuels S . Use of protective equipment among California farmers. Am J Ind Med. 2002; 42(5):455-64. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10134. View

4.
Macfarlane E, Chapman A, Benke G, Meaklim J, Sim M, McNeil J . Training and other predictors of personal protective equipment use in Australian grain farmers using pesticides. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 65(2):141-6. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.034843. View

5.
Fogarty G, Shaw A . Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: towards the prediction of unsafe behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 2010; 42(5):1455-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008. View