» Articles » PMID: 30133438

Does the Mexican Sugar-sweetened Beverage Tax Have a Signaling Effect? ENSANUT 2016

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Aug 23
PMID 30133438
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the potential signaling effect of the Mexican tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) by analyzing the association between awareness of and opinions about its effectiveness with current consumption of taxed SSBs and with a self-reported change in consumption of SSBs since the implementation of the tax. We also examined the association between psychosocial and environmental determinants of SSB consumption with current consumption of taxed SSBs and with a reported change in consumption of SSBs.

Methods: Cross-sectional analyses of survey and food-frequency questionnaire data from the Mexican National Health and Nutrition Survey 2016. Participants were Mexican adults (20-59 years, N = 6,650). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the probability of a person reporting a decrease in SSB consumption, given their awareness of the tax, opinion about its effectiveness, psychosocial (SSB health-related beliefs, self-efficacy, and liking of SSBs) and environmental (availability of potable water) determinants. Multiple linear regression analysis was utilized to examine the association between the aforementioned factors and current consumption of taxed SSBs.

Results: Compared with adults not aware, adults who were aware of the SSB tax were more likely (OR = 1.30) to report a decrease in SSB consumption (p = .012). In urban areas, adults aware of the tax drank a significantly lower amount of taxed SSBs (-15.7%; p = .023) than those not aware. Self-efficacy and liking of SSBs were significantly associated with a reported decrease in consumption and with current consumption (p < .001), while health beliefs and availability of potable water were not significantly associated with either reported change in SSB consumption or current consumption of taxed SSBs.

Conclusions: Implementation of an SSB tax accompanied by highly visible campaigns may further influence the impact of taxes on SSBs consumption. Future public health and nutrition education campaigns designed to increase knowledge and enhance motivation should be complemented by programs to assist individuals develop self-efficacy and self-regulation skills.

Citing Articles

Estimated changes in free sugar consumption one year after the UK soft drinks industry levy came into force: controlled interrupted time series analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2011-2019).

Rogers N, Cummins S, Jones C, Mytton O, Rayner M, Rutter H J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 78(9):578-584.

PMID: 38981684 PMC: 11347969. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-221051.


Do financial constraint and perceived stress modify the effects of food tax schemes on food purchases: moderation analyses in a virtual supermarket experiment.

Djojosoeparto S, Poelman M, Eykelenboom M, Beenackers M, Steenhuis I, van Stralen M Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e38.

PMID: 38224250 PMC: 10897579. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024000077.


Comparison of Dietary Intake Before vs After Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods in Mexico, 2012 to 2018.

Batis C, Castellanos-Gutierrez A, Sanchez-Pimienta T, Reyes-Garcia A, Colchero M, Basto-Abreu A JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(7):e2325191.

PMID: 37486629 PMC: 10366703. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25191.


Using GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks to support the process of health policy-making: an example application regarding taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Stadelmaier J, Rehfuess E, Forberger S, Eisele-Metzger A, Nagavci B, Schunemann H Eur J Public Health. 2022; 32(Suppl 4):iv92-iv100.

PMID: 36444109 PMC: 9706117. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac077.


Are intentions to change, policy awareness, or health knowledge related to changes in dietary intake following a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa? A before-and-after study.

Essman M, Zimmer C, Carpentier F, Swart E, Smith Taillie L Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022; 19(1):136.

PMID: 36307849 PMC: 9617427. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01370-5.


References
1.
Greenwood D, Threapleton D, Evans C, Cleghorn C, Nykjaer C, Woodhead C . Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Nutr. 2014; 112(5):725-34. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114514001329. View

2.
Kim S, Park S, Lin M . Permanent tooth loss and sugar-sweetened beverage intake in U.S. young adults. J Public Health Dent. 2016; 77(2):148-154. PMC: 6322216. DOI: 10.1111/jphd.12192. View

3.
. Decline in smoking prevalence--New York City, 2002-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007; 56(24):604-8. View

4.
Block J, Gillman M, Linakis S, Goldman R . "If it tastes good, I'm drinking it": qualitative study of beverage consumption among college students. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52(6):702-6. PMC: 3657589. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.017. View

5.
Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J . Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ. 2013; 346:e7492. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e7492. View