» Articles » PMID: 30132254

Linking the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2018 Aug 23
PMID 30132254
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Assistive technologies are widely implemented in clinical and research settings. Despite their dissemination, the psychosocial impact of their adoption still deserves further consideration. The aim of the present study is to determine the degree of compatibility between the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).

Methods: Six health professionals (two neurologists, one neuro-rehabilitation technician, two psychologists, one university professor of rehabilitation) created a technical board to discuss upon the PIADS-ICF linking. The standardized linking methodology was applied, and a Delphi technique was used to examine consensus.

Results: Five Delphi sessions were required to reach 100% of consensus and to finalize the procedure. Of the 26 PIADS' items, 23 were linked to an ICF category: 9 items were endorsed at the 3rd ICF level, and 14 items at the 2nd ICF level. Two items were classified as "not defined" and 1 item as "not covered".

Conclusion: The study highlighted the conceptual connection between the PIADS and the ICF framework and set a bio-psychosocial standpoint by which accounting the role of assistive devices in rehabilitation settings.

Citing Articles

Understanding the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Technologies for People With Visual Impairments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Szekely R, Holloway C, Bandukda M JMIR Res Protoc. 2025; 14:e65056.

PMID: 39946718 PMC: 11888052. DOI: 10.2196/65056.


The Impact of Frame Running on Quality of Life in Young Athletes With Mobility Limitations.

van Schie P, van Eck M, Bonouvrie L, Bos A, Buizer A Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:839285.

PMID: 35498527 PMC: 9046783. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.839285.


Exploring the psychosocial impact of simple robotic assistive technology on adolescents with neuromuscular disease.

Oldford L, Hanson N, Ross I, Croken E, Bleau L J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022; 9:20556683221087522.

PMID: 35386488 PMC: 8977698. DOI: 10.1177/20556683221087522.


Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale in a Large Sample of People With Neuromuscular, Neurological, or Hearing Disabilities.

Diez E, Jimenez-Arberas E, Pousada T Front Psychol. 2021; 12:659562.

PMID: 34177710 PMC: 8225245. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659562.


Preliminary evaluation of an automated robotic transfer assist device in the home setting.

Kulich H, Wei L, Crytzer T, Cooper R, Koontz A Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021; 18(5):511-518.

PMID: 33529539 PMC: 10759809. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1879283.

References
1.
Harada N, Fong S, Heiney C, Yentes J, Perell-Gerson K, Fang M . Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51(2):275-83. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0140. View

2.
MacPhee A, Kirby R, Coolen A, Smith C, MacLeod D, Dupuis D . Wheelchair skills training program: A randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00364-2. View

3.
Sommer R, Bullinger M, Rohenkohl A, Quitmann J, Brutt A . Linking a short-stature specific health-related quality of life measure (QoLISSY) to the International Classification of Functioning - Children and Youth (ICF-CY). Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 37(5):439-46. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.923528. View

4.
Giesbrecht E, Ripat J, Quanbury A, Cooper J . Participation in community-based activities of daily living: comparison of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair and a power wheelchair. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009; 4(3):198-207. DOI: 10.1080/17483100802543205. View

5.
Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, Arnold D, Wolfson C . Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24(1-3):21-30. DOI: 10.1080/09638280110066352. View