» Articles » PMID: 30131551

Childhood Cancer Research in Oxford III: The Work of CCRG on Ionising Radiation

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Aug 23
PMID 30131551
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High doses of ionising radiation are a known cause of childhood cancer and great public and professional interest attaches to possible links between childhood cancer and lower doses, particularly of man-made radiation. This paper describes work done by the Childhood Cancer Research Group (CCRG) on this topic METHODS: Most UK investigations have made use of the National Registry of Childhood Tumours and associated controls. Epidemiological investigations have included national incidence and mortality analyses, geographical investigations, record linkage and case-control studies. Dosimetric studies use biokinetic and dosimetric modelling.

Results: This paper reviews the work of the CCRG on the association between exposure to ionising radiation and childhood cancer, 1975-2014.

Conclusion: The work of CCRG has been influential in developing understanding of the causes of 'clusters' of childhood cancer and the risks arising from exposure to ionising radiation both natural and man-made. Some clusters around nuclear installations have certainly been observed, but ionising radiation does not seem to be a plausible cause. The group's work has also been instrumental in discounting the hypothesis that paternal preconception irradiation was a cause of childhood cancers and has demonstrated an increased leukaemia risk for children exposed to higher levels of natural gamma-ray radiation.

Citing Articles

The potential for reduced radiation dose from deep learning-based CT image reconstruction: A comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction using a phantom.

Lee J, Choi S, Hwang J, Lim S, Lee M, Yi B Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(19):e25814.

PMID: 34106619 PMC: 8133241. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025814.


Using primary teeth and archived dried spots for exposomic studies in children: Exploring new paths in the environmental epidemiology of pediatric cancer.

Lupo P, Petrick L, Hoang T, Janitz A, Marcotte E, Schraw J Bioessays. 2021; 43(9):e2100030.

PMID: 34106479 PMC: 8390438. DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100030.


Cancer Progress and Priorities: Childhood Cancer.

Lupo P, Spector L Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020; 29(6):1081-1094.

PMID: 32482635 PMC: 9400945. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0941.


Case-control study of paternal occupational exposures and childhood lymphoma in Great Britain, 1962-2010.

Bunch K, Kendall G, Stiller C, Vincent T, Murphy M Br J Cancer. 2019; 120(12):1153-1161.

PMID: 31105271 PMC: 6738046. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0469-7.


Childhood cancer research in Oxford I: the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers.

Bithell J, Draper G, Sorahan T, Stiller C Br J Cancer. 2018; 119(6):756-762.

PMID: 30131555 PMC: 6173688. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0180-0.


References
1.
Bithell J, Murphy M, Stiller C, Toumpakari E, Vincent T, Wakeford R . Leukaemia in young children in the vicinity of British nuclear power plants: a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109(11):2880-5. PMC: 3844901. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.560. View

2.
Kendall G, Little M, Wakeford R, Bunch K, Miles J, Vincent T . A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006. Leukemia. 2012; 27(1):3-9. PMC: 3998763. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.151. View

3.
Greaves M, Alexander F . An infectious etiology for common acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood?. Leukemia. 1993; 7(3):349-60. View

4.
Fairlie I . A hypothesis to explain childhood cancers near nuclear power plants. J Environ Radioact. 2013; 133:10-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.024. View

5.
Kendall G, Wakeford R, Athanson M, Vincent T, Carter E, McColl N . Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2016; 55(1):103-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-016-0635-8. View