» Articles » PMID: 30131071

Comparative Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions and Anti-hypertensive Pharmacological Interventions in Reducing Blood Pressure in People with Hypertension: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Syst Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Aug 23
PMID 30131071
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prevalence of hypertension is a major public health challenge. Despite it being highly preventable, hypertension is responsible for a significant proportion of global morbidity and mortality. Common methods for controlling hypertension include prescribing anti-hypertensive medication, a pharmacological approach, and increasing physical activity, a behavioural approach. In general, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological and behavioural approaches for reducing blood pressure in hypertension. A previous network meta-analysis suggested that physical activity interventions may be just as effective as many anti-hypertensive medications in preventing mortality; however, this analysis did not provide the comparative effectiveness of these disparate modes of intervention on blood pressure reduction. The primary objective of this study is to use network meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness, for blood pressure reduction, of different approaches to increasing physical activity and different first-line anti-hypertensive therapies in people with hypertension.

Methods: A systematic review will be conducted to identify studies involving randomised controlled trials which compare different types of physical activity interventions and first-line anti-hypertensive therapy interventions to each other or to other comparators (e.g. placebo, usual care) where blood pressure reduction is the primary outcome. We will search the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and PsycInfo. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, two reviewers will extract data independently and assess the quality of the literature using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Network meta-analyses will be conducted to generate estimates of comparative effectiveness of each intervention class and rankings of their effectiveness, in terms of reduction of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Discussion: This study will provide evidence regarding the comparability of two common first-line treatment options for people with hypertension. It will also describe the extent to which there is direct evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of increasing physical activity and initiating anti-hypertensive therapy.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42017070579.

Citing Articles

Hypertension: A Continuing Public Healthcare Issue.

Goorani S, Zangene S, Imig J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39795981 PMC: 11720251. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010123.


A Real-World Study on the Short-Term Efficacy of Amlodipine in Treating Hypertension Among Inpatients.

Wang T, Tan J, Wang T, Xiang S, Zhang Y, Jian C Pragmat Obs Res. 2024; 15:121-137.

PMID: 39130528 PMC: 11316486. DOI: 10.2147/POR.S464439.


Research status and trends of physical activity on depression or anxiety: a bibliometric analysis.

Zhang X, Ye F, Yin Z, Li Y, Bao Q, Xia M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1337739.

PMID: 38586196 PMC: 10996447. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1337739.


Real-world demographic patterns of users of a digital primary prevention service for diabetes.

Balakrishnan P, Jacyshyn-Owen E, Eberl M, Friedrich B, Etter T Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 12(1):e0275.

PMID: 36582668 PMC: 9750647. DOI: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000275.


Risk of Hypertension and Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in the Physically Active Population under-70 Years Old-Spanish Health Survey.

Denche-Zamorano A, Perez-Gomez J, Mendoza-Munoz M, Carlos-Vivas J, Oliveira R, Brito J Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35885810 PMC: 9319692. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071283.


References
1.
Khan N, Bacon S, Khan S, Perlmutter S, Gerlinsky C, Dermer M . Hypertension management research priorities from patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers: A report from the Hypertension Canada Priority Setting Partnership Group. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017; 19(11):1063-1069. PMC: 8031279. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13091. View

2.
Ding D, Lawson K, Kolbe-Alexander T, Finkelstein E, Katzmarzyk P, van Mechelen W . The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016; 388(10051):1311-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X. View

3.
Hawkins S, Cockburn M, Hamilton A, Mack T . An estimate of physical activity prevalence in a large population-based cohort. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(2):253-60. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113485.06374.0E. View

4.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

5.
Slattery B, Haugh S, Francis K, OConnor L, Barrett K, Dwyer C . Protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis of the modalities used to deliver eHealth interventions for chronic pain. Syst Rev. 2017; 6(1):45. PMC: 5335823. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0414-x. View