» Articles » PMID: 30127763

Utilizing a Structural Mechanics Approach to Assess the Primary Effects of Injury Loads Onto the Axon and Its Components

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Aug 22
PMID 30127763
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) occurs as a result of the transmission of rapid dynamic loads from the head to the brain and specifically to its neurons. Despite being one of the most common and most deleterious types of traumatic brain injury (TBI), the inherent cell injury mechanism is yet to be understood. Experimental observations have led to the formulation of different hypotheses, such as mechanoporation of the axolemma and microtubules (MTs) breakage. With the goal of singling out the mechanical aspect of DAI and to resolve the ambiguity behind its injury mechanism, a composite finite element (FE) model of a representative volume of an axon was developed. Once calibrated and validated against published experimental data, the axonal model was used to simulate injury scenarios. The resulting strain distributions along its components were then studied in dependence of strain rate and of typical modeling choices such as the applied MT constraints and tau proteins failure. Results show that oversimplifying the MT bundle kinematic entails a systematic attenuation ( = 2.33) of the computed maximum MT strain. Nevertheless, altogether, results support the hypothesis of axolemma mechanoporation as a cell-injury trigger. Moreover, for the first time the interconnection between the axolemma and the MT bundle is shown to play a role in damage localization. The proposed FE axonal model is a valuable tool to understand the axonal injury mechanism from a mechanical perspective and could be used in turn for the definition of well-informed injury criteria at the tissue and organ level.

Citing Articles

Image-based axon model highlights heterogeneity in initiation of damage.

Wang L, Goodman M, Kuhl E Biophys J. 2022; 122(1):9-19.

PMID: 36461640 PMC: 9822833. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.2946.


Viscoelastic damage evaluation of the axon.

Hasan F, Mahmud K, Khan M, Adnan A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:904818.

PMID: 36277388 PMC: 9583024. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.904818.


A Brief Review of In Vitro Models for Injury and Regeneration in the Peripheral Nervous System.

Varier P, Raju G, Madhusudanan P, Jerard C, Shankarappa S Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(2).

PMID: 35055003 PMC: 8775373. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020816.


Mathematical models of neuronal growth.

Oliveri H, Goriely A Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022; 21(1):89-118.

PMID: 34994872 PMC: 8807500. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-021-01539-0.


Investigation of the Compressive Viscoelastic Properties of Brain Tissue Under Time and Frequency Dependent Loading Conditions.

Li W, E T Shepherd D, M Espino D Ann Biomed Eng. 2021; 49(12):3737-3747.

PMID: 34608583 PMC: 8671270. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02866-0.


References
1.
Li F, Chan C, Ohl C . Rebuttal to a comment by Richard E. Waugh on our article "Yield strength of human erythrocyte membranes to impulsive stretching". Biophys J. 2014; 106(8):1832-3. PMC: 4008838. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.010. View

2.
Ahmadzadeh H, Smith D, Shenoy V . Mechanical Effects of Dynamic Binding between Tau Proteins on Microtubules during Axonal Injury. Biophys J. 2015; 109(11):2328-37. PMC: 4675823. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.09.010. View

3.
Rammensee S, Janmey P, Bausch A . Mechanical and structural properties of in vitro neurofilament hydrogels. Eur Biophys J. 2007; 36(6):661-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00249-007-0141-7. View

4.
Fadic R, Vergara J, Alvarez J . Microtubules and caliber of central and peripheral processes of sensory axons. J Comp Neurol. 1985; 236(2):258-64. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902360209. View

5.
Humphreys I, Wood R, Phillips C, Macey S . The costs of traumatic brain injury: a literature review. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013; 5:281-7. PMC: 3699059. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S44625. View