» Articles » PMID: 30124300

Uncovering General, Shared, and Unique Temporal Patterns in Ambulatory Assessment Data

Overview
Journal Psychol Methods
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Aug 21
PMID 30124300
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensive longitudinal data provide psychological researchers with the potential to better understand individual-level temporal processes. While the collection of such data has become increasingly common, there are a comparatively small number of methods well-suited for analyzing these data, and many methods assume homogeneity across individuals. A recent development rooted in structural equation and vector autoregressive modeling, Subgrouping Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (S-GIMME), provides one method for arriving at individual-level models composed of processes shared by the sample, a subset of the sample, and a given individual. As this algorithm was motivated and validated for use with neuroimaging data, its performance is less understood in the context of ambulatory assessment data. Here, we evaluate the performance of the S-GIMME algorithm across various conditions frequently encountered with daily diary (compared to neuroimaging) data; namely, a smaller number of variables, a lower number of time points, and smaller autoregressive effects. We demonstrate, for the first time, the importance of the autoregressive effects in recovering data-generating connections and directions, and the ability to use S-GIMME with lengths of data commonly seen in daily diary studies. We demonstrate the use of S-GIMME with an empirical example evaluating the general, shared, and unique temporal processes associated with a sample of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Finally, we underscore the need for methods such as S-GIMME moving forward given the increasing use of intensive longitudinal data in psychological research, and the potential for these data to provide novel insights into human behavior and mental health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Whole Person Recovery from Substance Use Disorder: A Call for Research Examining a Dynamic Behavioral Ecological Model of Contexts Supportive of Recovery.

Witkiewitz K, Tucker J Addict Res Theory. 2025; 33(1):1-12.

PMID: 40059906 PMC: 11883499. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2024.2329580.


Examining Caregiver Practices During Adolescent Outpatient Alcohol Use and Co-Occurring Mental Health Treatment: Protocol for a Dyadic Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Meisel S, Hogue A, Kelly J, McQuaid E, Miranda Jr R JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e63399.

PMID: 39705699 PMC: 11702013. DOI: 10.2196/63399.


Integrating dynamic psychophysiological indices across time and contexts: Elucidating mechanisms, risk markers, and intervention targets.

Stange J Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(10):e14630.

PMID: 39082831 PMC: 11473238. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14630.


Clustering Individuals Based on Similarity in Idiographic Factor Loading Patterns.

Arizmendi C, Gates K Multivariate Behav Res. 2024; 1-25.

PMID: 39044482 PMC: 11754526. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2374826.


Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models.

Coppersmith D, Kleiman E, Millner A, Wang S, Arizmendi C, Bentley K Behav Res Ther. 2024; 180:104574.

PMID: 38838615 PMC: 11323201. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104574.


References
1.
Kotov R, Krueger R, Watson D, Achenbach T, Althoff R, Bagby R . The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017; 126(4):454-477. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000258. View

2.
Molenaar P, Beltz A, Gates K, Wilson S . State space modeling of time-varying contemporaneous and lagged relations in connectivity maps. Neuroimage. 2015; 125:791-802. PMC: 5378168. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.088. View

3.
Sadikaj G, Moskowitz D, Russell J, Zuroff D, Paris J . Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012; 122(1):195-207. DOI: 10.1037/a0030871. View

4.
Hamaker E, Asparouhov T, Brose A, Schmiedek F, Muthen B . At the Frontiers of Modeling Intensive Longitudinal Data: Dynamic Structural Equation Models for the Affective Measurements from the COGITO Study. Multivariate Behav Res. 2018; 53(6):820-841. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1446819. View

5.
Smith S, Miller K, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann C, Nichols T . Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(2):875-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063. View