» Articles » PMID: 30122993

Tracking Steps in Oncology: the Time is Now

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Aug 21
PMID 30122993
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Accurate evaluation of patients' health status is a key component of the workup, treatment, and follow-up of cancer patients. Assessments by clinicians (eg, performance status, toxicity grade) and patients (eg, quality of life) play a critical role in current practice but have significant limitations. Technological advances now provide an opportunity to track a new class of objective measures of patient activity, such as daily step counts. Here, we describe recent efforts to incorporate this technology into the field of oncology.

Design: We conducted a structured literature search using MEDLINE electronic database to identify published observational studies of tracking steps in cancer patients and trials of exercise programs for cancer survivors incorporating pedometers until February 2016.

Results: Data indicate that physical activity information may supplant existing scales for the assessment of cancer patients' functional capacity.

Conclusion: Objective activity monitoring is poised to revolutionize the way health care providers assess cancer patients at the time of diagnosis, during treatment, and in the survivorship setting.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Care Coordination in Oncology and Nononcology Thoracic Surgery Care Pathways Through a Digital Health Solution: Mixed Methods Study.

Nabelsi V, Plouffe V JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e60222.

PMID: 39591606 PMC: 11632290. DOI: 10.2196/60222.


Mobility Assessment Instruments.

Fessele K, Syrkin G Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024; 40(4):151660.

PMID: 39013731 PMC: 11492455. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151660.


Remote Patient-Reported Outcomes and Activity Monitoring to Improve Patient-Clinician Communication Regarding Symptoms and Functional Status: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Parikh R, Schriver E, Ferrell W, Wakim J, Williamson J, Khan N JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 19(12):1143-1151.

PMID: 37816198 PMC: 10732505. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00048.


Improved awareness of physical activities is associated with a gain of fitness and a stable body weight in breast cancer patients during the first year of antineoplastic therapy: the BEGYN-1 study.

Zemlin C, Schleicher J, Altmayer L, Stuhlert C, Wormann C, Lang M Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1198157.

PMID: 37637039 PMC: 10456044. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1198157.


Wearable-Based Stair Climb Power Estimation and Activity Classification.

Psaltos D, Mamashli F, Adamusiak T, Demanuele C, Santamaria M, Czech M Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(17).

PMID: 36081058 PMC: 9459813. DOI: 10.3390/s22176600.


References
1.
Maddocks M, Wilcock A . Exploring physical activity level in patients with thoracic cancer: implications for use as an outcome measure. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20(5):1113-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1393-z. View

2.
Evenson K, Goto M, Furberg R . Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12:159. PMC: 4683756. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1. View

3.
Ferriolli E, Skipworth R, Hendry P, Scott A, Stensteth J, Dahele M . Physical activity monitoring: a responsive and meaningful patient-centered outcome for surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy?. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012; 43(6):1025-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.013. View

4.
Cormie P, Galvao D, Spry N, Joseph D, Chee R, Taaffe D . Can supervised exercise prevent treatment toxicity in patients with prostate cancer initiating androgen-deprivation therapy: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2014; 115(2):256-66. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12646. View

5.
von Gruenigen V, Frasure H, Kavanagh M, Lerner E, Waggoner S, Courneya K . Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention for ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122(2):328-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.043. View