» Articles » PMID: 30120846

The Neural Basis of Motivational Influences on Cognitive Control

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Aug 19
PMID 30120846
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cognitive control mechanisms support the deliberate regulation of thought and behavior based on current goals. Recent work suggests that motivational incentives improve cognitive control and has begun to elucidate critical neural substrates. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of motivated cognitive control using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) and Neurosynth to delineate the brain regions that are consistently activated across studies. The analysis included studies that investigated changes in brain activation during cognitive control tasks when reward incentives were present versus absent. The ALE analysis revealed consistent recruitment in regions associated with the frontoparietal control network including the inferior frontal sulcus and intraparietal sulcus, as well as regions associated with the salience network including the anterior insula and anterior mid-cingulate cortex. As a complementary analysis, we performed a large-scale exploratory meta-analysis using Neurosynth to identify regions that are recruited in studies using of the terms cognitive control and incentive. This analysis replicated the ALE results and also identified the rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens, medial thalamus, inferior frontal junction, premotor cortex, and hippocampus. Finally, we separately compared recruitment during cue and target periods, which tap into proactive engagement of rule-outcome associations, and the mobilization of appropriate viscero-motor states to execute a response, respectively. We found that largely distinct sets of brain regions are recruited during cue and target periods. Altogether, these findings suggest that flexible interactions between frontoparietal, salience, and dopaminergic midbrain-striatal networks may allow control demands to be precisely tailored based on expected value.

Citing Articles

Cognitive control: modeling the impact on mental health.

Alker L Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1452714.

PMID: 40062198 PMC: 11885272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1452714.


Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making.

Yee D J Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 36(12):2822-2830.

PMID: 39378176 PMC: 11602011. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02258.


Neurophysiology of Effortful Listening: Decoupling Motivational Modulation from Task Demands.

Kraus F, Ross B, Herrmann B, Obleser J J Neurosci. 2024; 44(44).

PMID: 39261007 PMC: 11529814. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0589-24.2024.


Orthogonal neural encoding of targets and distractors supports multivariate cognitive control.

Ritz H, Shenhav A Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(5):945-961.

PMID: 38459265 PMC: 11219097. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01826-7.


The competition dynamics of approach and avoidance motivations following interpersonal transgression.

Shen B, Chen Y, He Z, Li W, Yu H, Zhou X Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(40):e2302484120.

PMID: 37769254 PMC: 10556639. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2302484120.


References
1.
Medford N, Critchley H . Conjoint activity of anterior insular and anterior cingulate cortex: awareness and response. Brain Struct Funct. 2010; 214(5-6):535-49. PMC: 2886906. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-010-0265-x. View

2.
Krebs R, Boehler C, Roberts K, Song A, Woldorff M . The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 22(3):607-15. PMC: 3278318. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr134. View

3.
Yarkoni T, Poldrack R, Van Essen D, Wager T . Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(11):489-96. PMC: 2963679. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004. View

4.
McClure S, Laibson D, Loewenstein G, Cohen J . Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004; 306(5695):503-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100907. View

5.
Brass M, Derrfuss J, Forstmann B, von Cramon D . The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(7):314-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.001. View