» Articles » PMID: 30120444

Distributional Cues to Language Learning in Children With Intellectual Disabilities

Overview
Date 2018 Aug 19
PMID 30120444
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In typical development, distributional cues-patterns in input-are related to language acquisition processes. Statistical and implicit learning refer to the utilization of such cues. In children with intellectual disability, much less is known about the extent to which distributional cues are harnessed in mechanisms of language learning.

Method: This tutorial presents what is known about the process of language learning in children with language impairments associated with different sources of intellectual disability: Williams syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, and fragile X syndrome.

Results: A broad view is taken on distributional cues relevant to language learning, including statistical learning (e.g., transitional probabilities) and other patterns that support lexical acquisition (e.g., sensitivities to sound patterns, cross-situational word learning) or relate to syntactic development (e.g., nonadjacent dependencies).

Conclusions: Critical gaps in the literature are highlighted. Research in this area is especially limited for Down syndrome and fragile X syndrome. Future directions for taking learning theories into account in interventions for children with intellectual disability are discussed, with a focus on the importance of language input.

Citing Articles

Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Telegraphic Versus Grammatical Utterances: A Survey Study.

Venker C, McDaniel J, Yasick M J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(7):2271-2280.

PMID: 32579870 PMC: 7838838. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00132.


Acquisition of Verb Meaning From Syntactic Distribution in Preschoolers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Horvath S, McDermott E, Reilly K, Arunachalam S Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018; 49(3S):668-680.

PMID: 30120445 PMC: 6198912. DOI: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0126.

References
1.
Kidd E, Arciuli J . Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Children's Comprehension of Syntax. Child Dev. 2015; 87(1):184-93. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12461. View

2.
Hillier L, Fulton R, Fulton L, Graves T, Pepin K, Wagner-McPherson C . The DNA sequence of human chromosome 7. Nature. 2003; 424(6945):157-64. DOI: 10.1038/nature01782. View

3.
Vicari S, Verucci L, Carlesimo G . Implicit memory is independent from IQ and age but not from etiology: evidence from Down and Williams syndromes. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007; 51(Pt 12):932-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01003.x. View

4.
Ellawadi A, Weismer S . Using Spoken Language Benchmarks to Characterize the Expressive Language Skills of Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015; 24(4):696-707. PMC: 4698469. DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0190. View

5.
Vinter A, Detable C . Implicit learning in children and adolescents with mental retardation. Am J Ment Retard. 2003; 108(2):94-107. DOI: 10.1352/0895-8017(2003)108<0094:ILICAA>2.0.CO;2. View