» Articles » PMID: 30114370

Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles

Overview
Date 2018 Aug 17
PMID 30114370
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Molecular docking can account for receptor flexibility by combining the docking score over multiple rigid receptor conformations, such as snapshots from a molecular dynamics simulation. Here, we evaluate a number of common snapshot selection strategies using a quality metric from stratified sampling, the efficiency of stratification, which compares the variance of a selection strategy to simple random sampling. We also extend the metric to estimators of exponential averages (which involve an exponential transformation, averaging, and inverse transformation) and minima. For docking sets of over 500 ligands to four different proteins of varying flexibility, we observe that, for estimating ensemble averages and exponential averages, many clustering algorithms have similar performance trends: for a few snapshots (less than 25), medoids are the most efficient, while, for a larger number, optimal (the allocation that minimizes the variance) and proportional (to the size of each cluster) allocation become more efficient. Proportional allocation appears to be the most consistently efficient for estimating minima.

Citing Articles

On Inactivation of the Coronavirus Main Protease.

Nguyen H, Tufts J, Minh D J Chem Inf Model. 2024; 64(5):1644-1656.

PMID: 38423522 PMC: 10936523. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01518.


Benchmarking ensemble docking methods in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Gan J, Kumar D, Chen C, Taylor B, Jagger B, Amaro R J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2022; 36(2):87-99.

PMID: 35199221 PMC: 8907095. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-021-00433-2.

References
1.
Dolinsky T, Nielsen J, McCammon J, Baker N . PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(Web Server issue):W665-7. PMC: 441519. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh381. View

2.
Craig I, Pfleger C, Gohlke H, Essex J, Spiegel K . Pocket-space maps to identify novel binding-site conformations in proteins. J Chem Inf Model. 2011; 51(10):2666-79. DOI: 10.1021/ci200168b. View

3.
Durrant J, Votapka L, Sorensen J, Amaro R . POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics. J Chem Theory Comput. 2014; 10(11):5047-5056. PMC: 4230373. DOI: 10.1021/ct500381c. View

4.
Ponder J, Case D . Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem. 2003; 66:27-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x. View

5.
Xu M, Lill M . Significant enhancement of docking sensitivity using implicit ligand sampling. J Chem Inf Model. 2011; 51(3):693-706. PMC: 3172320. DOI: 10.1021/ci100457t. View