Frequency of Germline Mutations in Cancer Susceptibility Genes in Malignant Mesothelioma
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: The aim of the current study was to determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of germline cancer susceptibility mutations in patients with malignant mesothelioma (MM).
Methods: We performed targeted capture and next-generation sequencing of 85 cancer susceptibility genes on germline DNA from 198 patients with pleural, peritoneal, and tunica vaginalis MM.
Results: Twenty-four germline mutations were identified in 13 genes in 23 (12%) of 198 patients. BAP1 mutations were the most common (n = 6; 25%). The remaining were in genes involved in DNA damage sensing and repair (n = 14), oxygen sensing (n = 2), endosome trafficking (n = 1), and cell growth (n = 1). Pleural site (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.58; P < .01), asbestos exposure (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.72; P < .01), and older age (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92 to 0.99; P = .01) were associated with decreased odds of carrying a germline mutation, whereas having a second cancer diagnosis (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.22 to 9.07; P = .02) significantly increased the odds. The odds of carrying a mutation in BAP1 (OR, 1,658; 95% CI, 199 to 76,224; P < .001), BRCA2 (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 14.7; P = .03), CDKN2A (OR, 53; 95% CI, 6 to 249; P < .001), TMEM127 (OR, 88; 95% CI, 1.7 to 1,105; P = .01), VHL (OR, 51; 95% CI, 1.1 to 453; P = .02), and WT1 (OR, 20; 95% CI, 0.5 to 135; P = .049) were significantly higher in MM cases than in a noncancer control population. Tumor sequencing identified mutations in a homologous recombination pathway gene in 52% (n = 29 of 54).
Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with MM carry germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes, especially those with peritoneal MM, minimal asbestos exposure, young age, and a second cancer diagnosis. These data support clinical germline genetic testing for patients with MM and provide a rationale for additional investigation of the homologous recombination pathway in MM.
Xinjing Z, Lei G, Xinbao L, Zhonghe J, Zhiran Y, Chao G BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):270.
PMID: 39953460 PMC: 11829406. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13606-1.
Editorial: Asbestos and disease genomics: is mesothelioma a genomic paradigm?.
Jaurand M, Murphy F, Felley-Bosco E Front Toxicol. 2025; 6():1536344.
PMID: 39831064 PMC: 11739162. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1536344.
Nielsen D, Hsu M, Zapata 3rd M, Ciavarra G, van Zyl L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):169.
PMID: 39747518 PMC: 11697272. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84069-w.
Mesothelioma Cases in the World Trade Center Survivors.
Yilmaz M, Rashidfarokhi M, Pollard K, Durmus N, Keserci S, Sterman D Ann Case Rep. 2024; 9(2).
PMID: 39568634 PMC: 11578103. DOI: 10.29011/2574-7754.101709.
Ebrahimi A, Ak G, Ozel C, Izgordu H, Ghorbanpoor H, Hassan S ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2024; 7(11):3299-3333.
PMID: 39539262 PMC: 11555512. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.4c00324.