Commentary: Risk Assessment in the Age of Evidence-Based Practice and Policy

Overview

Journal Int J Forensic Ment Health

Date 2018 Aug 17

PMID 30111986

Citations 2

Authors

Sarah L Desmarais

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Risk assessment has come to be recognized as a key component of evidence-based practice and policy in psychiatric and correctional agencies. At the same time, however, there is significant debate in scientific, policy, and public arenas regarding the role of risk assessment instruments in mental health and criminal justice decision-making, and questions regarding the level of evidence supporting their usefulness. It is in light of these conflicting realities that the current commentary considers Williams, Wormith, Bonta and Sitarenios' (2017) re-examination of the Singh, Grann, and Fazel (2011) meta-analysis and recommendations made in "The Use of Meta-Analysis to Compare and Select Offender Risk Instruments." Additional limitations in the extant risk assessment research are identified and their implications for evidence-based practice and policy are discussed.

Citing Articles

Using the VERA-2R, professional and organisational aspects.

Duits N, Overdulve C, Kempes M Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1165279.

PMID: 37547204 PMC: 10400441. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1165279.

Methodological limitations in the measurement and statistical modeling of violence among adults with mental illness.

Johnson K, Desmarais S, Tueller S, Van Dorn R Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019; 28(3):e1776.

PMID: 30810262 PMC: 7650002. DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1776.

References

Troquete N, van den Brink R, Beintema H, Mulder T, van Os T, Schoevers R . Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2013; 202(5):365-71. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113043. View

Fazel S, Singh J, Doll H, Grann M . Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012; 345:e4692. PMC: 3404183. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e4692. View

van Elk M, Matzke D, Gronau Q, Guan M, Vandekerckhove J, Wagenmakers E . Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1365. PMC: 4569810. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365. View

Desmarais S, Johnson K, Singh J . Performance of recidivism risk assessment instruments in U.S. correctional settings. Psychol Serv. 2016; 13(3):206-222. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000075. View

Nonstad K, Webster C . How to fail in the implementation of a risk assessment scheme or any other new procedure in your organization. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011; 81(1):94-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01076.x. View

Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, Halfens R, Haug H, Fischer J . Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008; 193(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045534. View

Broughton T . Overselling risk assessment. Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014; 38(4):195. PMC: 4115424. DOI: 10.1192/pb.38.4.195a. View

Yang M, Wong S, Coid J . The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(5):740-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0020473. View

Roychowdhury A, Adshead G . Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: ethical tensions. Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014; 38(2):75-82. PMC: 4115407. DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.043315. View

10.

van de Sande R, Nijman H, Noorthoorn E, Wierdsma A, Hellendoorn E, van der Staak C . Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 199(6):473-8. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095141. View

11.

Buchanan A, Binder R, Norko M, Swartz M . Psychiatric violence risk assessment. Am J Psychiatry. 2012; 169(3):340. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.169.3.340. View

12.

Singh J, Desmarais S, Sellers B, Hylton T, Tirotti M, Van Dorn R . From Risk Assessment to Risk Management: Matching Interventions to Adolescent Offenders' Strengths and Vulnerabilities. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014; 47(Pt 1):1-9. PMC: 4207631. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.015. View

13.

Wand T, Large M . Little evidence for the usefulness of violence risk assessment. Br J Psychiatry. 2013; 202:468. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.202.6.468. View

14.

Viljoen J, McLachlan K, Vincent G . Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: a survey of clinical practices. Assessment. 2010; 17(3):377-95. DOI: 10.1177/1073191109359587. View

15.

Monahan J, Skeem J . Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015; 12:489-513. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092945. View

16.

Kling R, Yassi A, Smailes E, Lovato C, Koehoorn M . Evaluation of a violence risk assessment system (the Alert System) for reducing violence in an acute hospital: a before and after study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 48(5):534-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.006. View

17.

Penney S, Marshall L, Simpson A . The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community. Law Hum Behav. 2016; 40(4):374-86. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000183. View

18.

De Vries Robbe M, de Vogel V, Douglas K, Nijman H . Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law Hum Behav. 2014; 39(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000089. View

19.

Scurich N, Monahan J . Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism. Law Hum Behav. 2015; 40(1):36-41. DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000161. View

20.

Fazel S . Response to "The Use of Meta-Analysis to Compare and Select Offender Risk Instruments". Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2017; 16(1):16-17. PMC: 5460748. DOI: 10.1080/14999013.2016.1261965. View