» Articles » PMID: 30111278

New Tools to Screen Wild Peanut Species for Aflatoxin Accumulation and Genetic Fingerprinting

Overview
Journal BMC Plant Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Aug 17
PMID 30111278
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Aflatoxin contamination in peanut seeds is still a serious problem for the industry and human health. No stable aflatoxin resistant cultivars have yet been produced, and given the narrow genetic background of cultivated peanuts, wild species became an important source of genetic diversity. Wild peanut seeds, however, are not abundant, thus, an effective method of screening for aflatoxin accumulation using minimal seeds is highly desirable. In addition, keeping record of genetic fingerprinting of each accession would be very useful for breeding programs and for the identification of accessions within germplasm collections.

Results: In this study, we report a method of screening for aflatoxin accumulation that is applicable to the small-size seeds of wild peanuts, increases the reliability by testing seed viability, and records the genetic fingerprinting of the samples. Aflatoxin levels observed among 20 wild peanut species varied from zero to 19000 ng.g and 155 ng.g of aflatoxin B and B, respectively. We report the screening of 373 molecular markers, including 288 novel SSRs, tested on 20 wild peanut species. Multivariate analysis by Neighbor-Joining, Principal Component Analysis and 3D-Principal Coordinate Analysis using 134 (36 %) transferable markers, in general grouped the samples according to their reported genomes. The best 88 markers, those with high fluorescence, good scorability and transferability, are reported with BLAST results. High quality markers (total 98) that discriminated genomes are reported. A high quality marker with UPIC score 16 (16 out of 20 species discriminated) had significant hits on BLAST2GO to a pentatricopeptide-repeat protein, another marker with score 5 had hits on UDP-D-apiose synthase, and a third one with score 12 had BLASTn hits on La-RP 1B protein. Together, these three markers discriminated all 20 species tested.

Conclusions: This study provides a reliable method to screen wild species of peanut for aflatoxin resistance using minimal seeds. In addition we report 288 new SSRs for peanut, and a cost-effective combination of markers sufficient to discriminate all 20 species tested. These tools can be used for the systematic search of aflatoxin resistant germplasm keeping record of the genetic fingerprinting of the accessions tested for breeding purpose.

Citing Articles

Identification and Characterization of Peanut Seed Coat Secondary Metabolites Inhibiting Growth and Reducing Aflatoxin Contamination.

Commey L, Mechref Y, Burow M, Mendu V J Agric Food Chem. 2024; 72(43):23844-23858.

PMID: 39412821 PMC: 11528429. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c05517.


Genetic diversity, disease resistance, and environmental adaptation of Arachis duranensis L.: New insights from landscape genomics.

Massa A, Sobolev V, Faustinelli P, Tallury S, Thomas Stalker H, Lamb M PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0299992.

PMID: 38625995 PMC: 11020403. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299992.


Pre-harvest host-resistance to infection and aflatoxin B contaminations in groundnut ( L.) genotypes.

Akale Z, Mohammed A, Kebede A, Abady S Heliyon. 2023; 9(12):e23034.

PMID: 38125424 PMC: 10731223. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23034.


Genotyping tools and resources to assess peanut germplasm: smut-resistant landraces as a case study.

Massa A, Bressano M, Soave J, Buteler M, Seijo G, Sobolev V PeerJ. 2021; 9:e10581.

PMID: 33575123 PMC: 7849506. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10581.


Breeding Crops for Enhanced Food Safety.

Melotto M, Brandl M, Jacob C, Jay-Russell M, Micallef S, Warburton M Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:428.

PMID: 32351531 PMC: 7176021. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00428.


References
1.
Chopra R, Burow G, Simpson C, Chagoya J, Mudge J, Burow M . Transcriptome Sequencing of Diverse Peanut (Arachis) Wild Species and the Cultivated Species Reveals a Wealth of Untapped Genetic Variability. G3 (Bethesda). 2016; 6(12):3825-3836. PMC: 5144954. DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.026898. View

2.
Mondal S, Badigannavar A . Peanut rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) disease: its background and recent accomplishments towards disease resistance breeding. Protoplasma. 2015; 252(6):1409-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-015-0783-8. View

3.
Sobolev V . Simple, rapid, and inexpensive cleanup method for quantitation of aflatoxins in important agricultural products by HPLC. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55(6):2136-41. DOI: 10.1021/jf063669j. View

4.
Althouse R, Huff J, Tomatis L, Wllbourn J . An evaluation of chemicals and industrial processes associated with cancer in humans based on human and animal data: IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 20. Cancer Res. 1980; 40(1):1-12. View

5.
Liu L, Dang P, Chen C . Development and Utilization of InDel Markers to Identify Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Disease Resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:988. PMC: 4643128. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00988. View