» Articles » PMID: 30108535

Does Holistic Processing Require a Large Brain? Insights From Honeybees and Wasps in Fine Visual Recognition Tasks

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2018 Aug 16
PMID 30108535
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The expertise of humans for recognizing faces is largely based on holistic processing mechanism, a sophisticated cognitive process that develops with visual experience. The various visual features of a face are thus glued together and treated by the brain as a unique stimulus, facilitating robust recognition. Holistic processing is known to facilitate fine discrimination of highly similar visual stimuli, and involves specialized brain areas in humans and other primates. Although holistic processing is most typically employed with face stimuli, subjects can also learn to apply similar image analysis mechanisms when gaining expertise in discriminating novel visual objects, like becoming experts in recognizing birds or cars. Here, we ask if holistic processing with expertise might be a mechanism employed by the comparatively miniature brains of insects. We thus test whether honeybees () and/or wasps () can use holistic-like processing with experience to recognize images of human faces, or Navon-like parameterized-stimuli. These insect species are excellent visual learners and have previously shown ability to discriminate human face stimuli using configural type processing. Freely flying bees and wasps were consequently confronted with classical tests for holistic processing, the part-whole effect and the composite-face effect. Both species could learn similar faces from a standard face recognition test used for humans, and their performance in transfer tests was consistent with holistic processing as defined for studies on humans. Tests with parameterized stimuli also revealed a capacity of honeybees, but not wasps, to process complex visual information in a holistic way, suggesting that such sophisticated visual processing may be far more spread within the animal kingdom than previously thought, although may depend on ecological constraints.

Citing Articles

The ability of teleost fishes to recognize individual faces suggests an early evolutionary origin in vertebrates.

Kohda M, Sogawa S, Sowersby W Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1497386.

PMID: 39664642 PMC: 11632839. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497386.


Face processing in animal models: implications for autism spectrum disorder.

Sgado P, Pross A, Lamanna J, Adiletta A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1462272.

PMID: 39184326 PMC: 11341390. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1462272.


Quantity misperception by hymenopteran insects observing the solitaire illusion.

Howard S, Dyer A iScience. 2024; 27(2):108697.

PMID: 38288356 PMC: 10823103. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108697.


Social experience drives the development of holistic face processing in paper wasps.

Pardo-Sanchez J, Tibbetts E Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(2):465-476.

PMID: 36066686 PMC: 11500689. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01666-w.


Visual Perception of Photographs of Rotated 3D Objects in Goldfish ().

Wegman J, Morrison E, Wilcox K, DeLong C Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(14).

PMID: 35883344 PMC: 9311921. DOI: 10.3390/ani12141797.


References
1.
Strausfeld N, Hansen L, Li Y, Gomez R, Ito K . Evolution, discovery, and interpretations of arthropod mushroom bodies. Learn Mem. 1999; 5(1-2):11-37. PMC: 311242. View

2.
Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore J, Anderson A . Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(2):191-7. DOI: 10.1038/72140. View

3.
Kanwisher N . Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3(8):759-63. DOI: 10.1038/77664. View

4.
Collishaw S, Hole G . Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception. 2001; 29(8):893-909. DOI: 10.1068/p2949. View

5.
Kendrick K, da Costa A, Leigh A, Hinton M, Peirce J . Sheep don't forget a face. Nature. 2001; 414(6860):165-6. DOI: 10.1038/35102669. View