» Articles » PMID: 30107866

Contaminated Shipping Materials Identified As the Source of Rotaviral Infection of Exported Mice

Overview
Date 2018 Aug 16
PMID 30107866
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over a 4-wk period in 2017, we received notification from 7 different institutions that mice exported from our SPF barrier facilities had tested positive for mouse rotavirus (MRV). The exports originated from several different buildings across multiple campuses. Our institution excludes MRV in all of our barrier facilities and has historically been free of this virus. Extensive testing of our rooms from which the exported mice originated did not detect the presence of rotavirus. The single commonality among the 7 shipments was the use of shipping boxes acquired from one vendor. These shipping boxes arrived at our institution prepackaged with unsterilized feed and bedding, which we hypothesized was the source of the rotavirus. To test this hypothesis, we housed naïve sentinel mice in clean cages with feed and bedding transferred from 29 unopened, unused shipping boxes. Sentinel mice were exposed to this bedding and feed for 14 d and then evaluated through MRV serology and PCR assay. Of the 29 sentinels, 24 were seropositive for MRV, and 14 of the 29 were PCR positive. These results provided direct evidence that MRV detected by recipient institutions originated from the contaminated feed or bedding within the shipping boxes. To our knowledge, this report is the first description of contaminated materials in shipping boxes resulting in rotaviral infection of mice during export.

Citing Articles

Effect of Common Variables on Autoclave Best Practices in Rodent Barrier Programs.

Skolnik H, Roberts C, Mabunga D, Lindstrom K J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2025; 64(1):166-171.

PMID: 40035282 PMC: 11808364. DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-089.


Health Monitoring of Laboratory Rodent Colonies-Talking about (R)evolution.

Buchheister S, Bleich A Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 34069175 PMC: 8155880. DOI: 10.3390/ani11051410.

References
1.
Kendall L, Steffen E, Riley L . Indirect Fluorescent Antibody (IFA) Assay. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002; 38(4):68. View

2.
Wunderlich M, Dodge M, Dhawan R, Shek W . Multiplexed fluorometric immunoassay testing methodology and troubleshooting. J Vis Exp. 2012; (58). PMC: 3679643. DOI: 10.3791/3715. View

3.
KRAFT L . Studies on the etiology and transmission of epidemic diarrhea of infant mice. J Exp Med. 1957; 106(5):743-55. PMC: 2136824. DOI: 10.1084/jem.106.5.743. View

4.
Pritchett-Corning K, Cosentino J, Clifford C . Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats. Lab Anim. 2008; 43(2):165-73. DOI: 10.1258/la.2008.008009. View

5.
Shek W, Pritchett K, Clifford C, White W . Large-scale rodent production methods make vendor barrier rooms unlikely to have persistent low-prevalence parvoviral infections. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2005; 44(4):37-42. View