» Articles » PMID: 30107271

Paradox of PEGylation in Fabricating Hybrid Nanoparticle-based Nicotine Vaccines

Overview
Journal Biomaterials
Date 2018 Aug 15
PMID 30107271
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has long been used in nanoparticle-based drug or vaccine delivery platforms. In this study, nano-nicotine vaccines (NanoNicVac) were PEGylated to different degrees to investigate the impact of PEG on the immunological efficacy of the vaccine. Hybrid nanoparticles with various degrees of PEGylation (2.5%-30%) were assembled. It was found that 30% PEGylation resulted in a hybrid nanoparticle of a compromised core-shell structure. A higher concentration of PEG also led to a slower cellular uptake of hybrid nanoparticles by dendritic cells. However, increasing the quantity of the PEG could effectively reduce nanoparticle aggregation during storage and improve the stability of the hybrid nanoparticles. Subsequently, nicotine vaccines were synthesized by conjugating nicotine haptens to the differently PEGylated hybrid nanoparticles. In both in vitro and in vivo studies, it was found that a nicotine vaccine with 20% PEGylation (NanoNicVac 20.0) was significantly more stable than the vaccines with lower PEGylation. In addition, NanoNicVac 20.0 induced a significantly higher anti-nicotine antibody titer of 3.7 ± 0.6 × 10 in mice than the other NanoNicVacs with lower concentrations of PEG. In a subsequent pharmacokinetic study, the lowest brain nicotine concentration of 34 ± 11 ng/g was detected in mice that were immunized with NanoNicVac 20.0. In addition, no apparent adverse events were observed in mice immunized with NanoNicVac. In summary, 20% PEGylation confers NanoNicVac with desirable safety, the highest stability, and the best immunological efficacy in mice.

Citing Articles

Conjugation of Multiple Proteins Onto the Surface of PLGA/Lipid Hybrid Nanoparticles.

Hu H, Zhang C J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024; 113(1):e37807.

PMID: 39420678 PMC: 11669531. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37807.


Vaccines to Treat Substance Use Disorders: Current Status and Future Directions.

Lu T, Li X, Zheng W, Kuang C, Wu B, Liu X Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(1).

PMID: 38258095 PMC: 10820210. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010084.


Enteric pH responsive cargo release from PDA and PEG coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles: a comparative study in .

Sapre N, Chakraborty R, Purohit P, Bhat S, Das G, Bajpe S RSC Adv. 2022; 10(20):11716-11726.

PMID: 35496595 PMC: 9050832. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra11019d.


Computational mining of MHC class II epitopes for the development of universal immunogenic proteins.

Saylor K, Donnan B, Zhang C PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0265644.

PMID: 35349604 PMC: 8963548. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265644.


Formulation of Nanovaccines toward an Extended Immunity against Nicotine.

Hu Y, Zhao Z, Ehrich M, Zhang C ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13(24):27972-27982.

PMID: 34105952 PMC: 9201939. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c07049.


References
1.
Dal Porto J, Gauld S, Merrell K, Mills D, Pugh-Bernard A, Cambier J . B cell antigen receptor signaling 101. Mol Immunol. 2004; 41(6-7):599-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.04.008. View

2.
Patil H, Murugappan S, ter Veer W, Meijerhof T, de Haan A, Frijlink H . Evaluation of monophosphoryl lipid A as adjuvant for pulmonary delivered influenza vaccine. J Control Release. 2013; 174:51-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.11.013. View

3.
Zhao Z, Hu Y, Harmon T, Pentel P, Ehrich M, Zhang C . Rationalization of a nanoparticle-based nicotine nanovaccine as an effective next-generation nicotine vaccine: A focus on hapten localization. Biomaterials. 2017; 138:46-56. PMC: 5544940. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.031. View

4.
Cornuz J, Zwahlen S, Jungi W, Osterwalder J, Klingler K, van Melle G . A vaccine against nicotine for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2008; 3(6):e2547. PMC: 2432028. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002547. View

5.
Jokerst J, Lobovkina T, Zare R, Gambhir S . Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2011; 6(4):715-28. PMC: 3217316. DOI: 10.2217/nnm.11.19. View