» Articles » PMID: 30104372

How Children Come to Understand False Beliefs: A Shared Intentionality Account

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Aug 15
PMID 30104372
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To predict and explain the behavior of others, one must understand that their actions are determined not by reality but by their beliefs about reality. Classically, children come to understand beliefs, including false beliefs, at about 4-5 y of age, but recent studies using different response measures suggest that even infants (and apes!) have some skills as well. Resolving this discrepancy is not possible with current theories based on individual cognition. Instead, what is needed is an account recognizing that the key processes in constructing an understanding of belief are social and mental coordination with other persons and their (sometimes conflicting) perspectives. Engaging in such social and mental coordination involves species-unique skills and motivations of shared intentionality, especially as they are manifest in joint attention and linguistic communication, as well as sophisticated skills of executive function to coordinate the different perspectives involved. This shared intentionality account accords well with documented differences in the cognitive capacities of great apes and human children, and it explains why infants and apes pass some versions of false-belief tasks whereas only older children pass others.

Citing Articles

Bonobos point more for ignorant than knowledgeable social partners.

Townrow L, Krupenye C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(6):e2412450122.

PMID: 39899718 PMC: 11831142. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412450122.


Being honest won't pay. Seven- but not 5-year-olds begin to predict that others will lie for reputational reasons.

Klafka M, Liszkowski U PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317334.

PMID: 39792891 PMC: 11723524. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317334.


Growth Trajectories of Joint Attention and Play as Predictors for Language in Young Children at Elevated Likelihood for Autism.

Moerman F, Van de Vyver H, Warreyn P, Erdogan M, Noens I, Sivaraman M J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; .

PMID: 39692959 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06685-9.


Conversational topic maintenance and related cognitive abilities in autistic versus neurotypical children.

Abbot-Smith K, Matthews D, Bannard C, Nice J, Malkin L, Williams D Autism. 2024; 29(3):684-697.

PMID: 39431626 PMC: 11894863. DOI: 10.1177/13623613241286610.


Agent-Object Relationships in Level-2 Visual Perspective Taking: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Ford B, Monk R, Litchfield D, Qureshi A J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):72.

PMID: 39398222 PMC: 11468513. DOI: 10.5334/joc.398.


References
1.
Rakoczy H, Cluver A, Saucke L, Stoffregen N, Grabener A, Migura J . Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition. 2014; 131(1):60-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.011. View

2.
Heyes C, Frith C . The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science. 2014; 344(6190):1243091. DOI: 10.1126/science.1243091. View

3.
Leslie A, Friedman O, German T . Core mechanisms in "theory of mind". Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(12):528-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.001. View

4.
Dally J, Emery N, Clayton N . Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when. Science. 2006; 312(5780):1662-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1126539. View

5.
Buttelmann D, Carpenter M, Tomasello M . Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition. 2009; 112(2):337-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.006. View