» Articles » PMID: 30100877

Stationary Atrial Fibrillation Properties in the Goat Do Not Entail Stable or Recurrent Conduction Patterns

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2018 Aug 14
PMID 30100877
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electro-anatomical mapping of the atria is used to identify the substrate of atrial fibrillation (AF). Targeting this substrate by ablation in addition to pulmonary vein ablation did not consistently improve outcome in clinical trials. Generally, the assessment of the substrate is based on short recordings (≤10 s, often even shorter). Thus, targeting the AF substrate assumes spatiotemporal stationarity but little is known about the variability of electrophysiological properties of AF over time. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was maintained for 3-4 weeks after pericardial electrode implantation in 12 goats. Within a single AF episode 10 consecutive minutes were mapped on the left atrial free wall using a 249-electrode array (2.25 mm inter-electrode spacing). AF cycle length, fractionation index (FI), lateral dissociation, conduction velocity, breakthroughs, and preferentiality of conduction (Pref) were assessed per electrode and AF property maps were constructed. The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the 10 AF-property maps was calculated to quantify the degree spatiotemporal stationarity of AF properties. Furthermore, the number of waves and presence of re-entrant circuits were analyzed in the first 60-s file. Comparing conduction patterns over time identified recurrent patterns of AF with the use of recurrence plots. The averages of AF property maps were highly stable throughout the ten 60-s-recordings. Spatiotemporal stationarity was high for all 6 property maps, PCC ranged from 0.66 ± 0.11 for Pref to 0.98 ± 0.01 for FI. High stationarity was lost when AF was interrupted for about 1 h. However, the time delay between the recorded files within one episode did not affect PCC. Yet, multiple waves (7.7 ± 2.3) were present simultaneously within the recording area and during 9.2 ± 11% of the analyzed period a re-entrant circuit was observed. Recurrent patterns occurred rarely and were observed in only 3 out of 12 goats. During non-self-terminating AF in the goat, AF properties were stationary. Since this could not be attributed to stable recurrent conduction patterns during AF, it is suggested that AF properties are determined by anatomical and structural properties of the atria even when the conduction patterns are very variable.

Citing Articles

Selecting repetitive focal and rotational activation patterns with the highest probability of being a source of atrial fibrillation.

Hermans B, Ozgul O, Wolf M, Marques V, van Hunnik A, Verheule S J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2025; 7():100064.

PMID: 39802439 PMC: 11708417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmccpl.2024.100064.


Analysis of drug-induced and spontaneous cardioversions reveals similar patterns leading to termination of atrial fibrillation.

van Hunnik A, Sobota V, Zeemering S, Opacic D, Scaf B, DAlessandro E Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1399037.

PMID: 39092426 PMC: 11291310. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1399037.


Compartmentalization proteomics revealed endolysosomal protein network changes in a goat model of atrial fibrillation.

Ayagama T, Charles P, Bose S, Boland B, Priestman D, Aston D iScience. 2024; 27(6):109609.

PMID: 38827406 PMC: 11141153. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109609.


Long-Term Training Increases Atrial Fibrillation Sustainability in Standardbred Racehorses.

Carstensen H, Nissen S, Saljic A, Melis Hesselkilde E, van Hunnik A, Hohl M J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023; 16(5):1205-1219.

PMID: 37014465 PMC: 10615936. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-023-10378-6.


Electrocardiographic Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Computer Models and Animal Experiments to Clinical Value.

Salinet J, Molero R, Schlindwein F, Karel J, Rodrigo M, Rojo-Alvarez J Front Physiol. 2021; 12:653013.

PMID: 33995122 PMC: 8120164. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.653013.


References
1.
Zeemering S, Maesen B, Nijs J, Lau D, Granier M, Verheule S . Automated quantification of atrial fibrillation complexity by probabilistic electrogram analysis and fibrillation wave reconstruction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013; 2012:6357-60. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347448. View

2.
Lau D, Maesen B, Zeemering S, Verheule S, Crijns H, Schotten U . Stability of complex fractionated atrial electrograms: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23(9):980-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02335.x. View

3.
Swarup V, Baykaner T, Rostamian A, Daubert J, Hummel J, Krummen D . Stability of rotors and focal sources for human atrial fibrillation: focal impulse and rotor mapping (FIRM) of AF sources and fibrillatory conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25(12):1284-92. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12559. View

4.
Krummen D, Baykaner T, Schricker A, Kowalewski C, Swarup V, Miller J . Multicentre safety of adding Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) to conventional ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017; 19(5):769-774. PMC: 5834113. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw377. View

5.
Konings K, Kirchhof C, Smeets J, Wellens H, Penn O, Allessie M . High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 1994; 89(4):1665-80. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1665. View