» Articles » PMID: 30098025

Development of Deep Neural Network for Individualized Hepatobiliary Toxicity Prediction After Liver SBRT

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2018 Aug 12
PMID 30098025
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of radiation toxicity of healthy organs-at-risks (OARs) critically determines the radiation therapy (RT) success. The existing dose-volume histogram-based metric may grossly under/overestimate the therapeutic toxicity after 27% in liver RT and 50% in head-and-neck RT. We propose the novel paradigm for toxicity prediction by leveraging the enormous potential of deep learning and go beyond the existing dose/volume histograms.

Experimental Design: We employed a database of 125 liver stereotactic body RT (SBRT) cases with follow-up data to train deep learning-based toxicity predictor. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were applied to discover the consistent patterns in 3D dose plans associated with toxicities. To enhance the predicting power, we first pretrain the CNNs with transfer learning from 3D CT images of 2644 human organs. CNNs were then trained on liver SBRT cases. Furthermore, nondosimetric pretreatment features, such as patients' demographics, underlying liver diseases, liver-directed therapies, were inputted into the fully connected neural network for more comprehensive prediction. The saliency maps of CNNs were used to estimate the toxicity risks associated with irradiation of anatomical regions of specific OARs. In addition, we applied machine learning solutions to map numerical pretreatment features with hepatobiliary toxicity manifestation.

Results: Among 125 liver SBRT patients, 58 were treated for liver metastases, 36 for hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 for cholangiocarcinoma, and 4 for other histologies. We observed that CNN we able to achieve accurate hepatobiliary toxicity prediction with the AUC of 0.79, whereas combining CNN for 3D dose plan analysis and fully connected neural networks for numerical feature analysis resulted in AUC of 0.85. Deep learning produces almost two times fewer false-positive toxicity predictions in comparison to DVH-based predictions, when the number of false negatives, i.e., missed toxicities, was minimized. The CNN saliency maps automatically estimated the toxicity risks for portal vein (PV) regions. We discovered that irradiation of the proximal portal vein is associated with two times higher toxicity risks (risk score: 0.66) that irradiation of the left portal vein (risk score: 0.31).

Conclusions: The framework offers clinically accurate tools for hepatobiliary toxicity prediction and automatic identification of anatomical regions that are critical to spare during SBRT.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care.

Nishida N Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768061 PMC: 11673237. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121243.


External validation of a multimodality deep-learning normal tissue complication probability model for mandibular osteoradionecrosis trained on 3D radiation distribution maps and clinical variables.

Humbert-Vidan L, Hansen C, Patel V, Johansen J, King A, Urbano T Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 32:100668.

PMID: 39563783 PMC: 11574792. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100668.


Machine learning in image-based outcome prediction after radiotherapy: A review.

Yuan X, Ma C, Hu M, Qiu R, Salari E, Martini R J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 26(1):e14559.

PMID: 39556691 PMC: 11712300. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14559.


Clinical outcomes and safety of external beam radiotherapy with extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A single institutional clinical experience.

Park S, Rim C, Yoon W Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(6):399-406.

PMID: 39215481 PMC: 11630486. DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_195_24.


Radiotherapy toxicity prediction using knowledge-constrained generalized linear model.

Hu J, Fatyga M, Liu W, Schild S, Wong W, Vora S IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2024; 14(2):130-140.

PMID: 39055377 PMC: 11271844. DOI: 10.1080/24725579.2023.2227199.


References
1.
Shen D, Wu G, Suk H . Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017; 19:221-248. PMC: 5479722. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044442. View

2.
Fehr D, Veeraraghavan H, Wibmer A, Gondo T, Matsumoto K, Vargas H . Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(46):E6265-73. PMC: 4655555. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505935112. View

3.
Murray L, Dawson L . Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017; 27(3):247-255. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.02.002. View

4.
Yu K, Zhang C, Berry G, Altman R, Re C, Rubin D . Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:12474. PMC: 4990706. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12474. View

5.
Itakura H, Achrol A, Mitchell L, Loya J, Liu T, Westbroek E . Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities. Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7(303):303ra138. PMC: 4666025. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7582. View