» Articles » PMID: 30094352

Verification of HE-based CTV in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer Using Pan-cytokeratin

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2018 Aug 11
PMID 30094352
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For accurate target definition, we determined margins for the clinical target volume (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer in computed tomography (CT, 4.3 mm), magnetic resonance imaging (MR, 6.1 mm) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET, 5.2 mm). Previously, we used Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained whole-mount sections of total laryngectomy specimens as gold standard to define CTV margins. In the present study, we verified the HE-based tumor delineation with staining for pan-cytokeratin, specific for squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients with a T3/T4 laryngeal hypopharyngeal tumor were included. From each patient, a total laryngectomy specimen was obtained. Four subsequent 3-mm thick slices containing tumor were selected of which 4-µm thick whole-mount sections were obtained and stained with HE and for pan-cytokeratin CK-AE1/3. Tumors were microscopically delineated on both sections by an experienced head-and-neck pathologist. Tumor delineations were compared using the conformity index (CI) and the distance between both contours.

Results: The CI between HE-based and CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations was 0.87. The maximum and 95th percentile (p95) extent of the HE-based tumor delineations from the CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations were 1.7 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively. The maximum and p95 extent of the CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations from the HE-based tumor delineations was 1.9 mm and 0.8 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: Histopathological assessment of tumor outline on standard HE-stained sections is comparable to microscopic tumor extent based on squamous cell specific pan-cytokeratin staining. Therefore, CTV margins based on HE based tumor contour will be adequate.

Citing Articles

The Role of a Minimum Immunohistochemical Antibody Panel in Confirming Undifferentiated Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study at the Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

Mremi A, Yahaya J, Abraham Z, Mwakigonja A Niger Med J. 2020; 60(6):279-284.

PMID: 32180656 PMC: 7053275. DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_134_19.

References
1.
Rasch C, Steenbakkers R, Van Herk M . Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005; 15(3):136-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.01.005. View

2.
Caldas-Magalhaes J, Kasperts N, Kooij N, van den Berg C, Terhaard C, Raaijmakers C . Validation of imaging with pathology in laryngeal cancer: accuracy of the registration methodology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 82(2):e289-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.004. View

3.
Costa Ferreira B, Marques R, Khouri L, Santos T, Sa-Couto P, do Carmo Lopes M . Assessment and topographic characterization of locoregional recurrences in head and neck tumours. Radiat Oncol. 2015; 10:41. PMC: 4619282. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0345-4. View

4.
Vinod S, Jameson M, Min M, Holloway L . Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Radiother Oncol. 2016; 121(2):169-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.009. View

5.
Fleury B, Thariat J, Barnoud R, Buiret G, Lebreton F, Bancel B . [Microscopic extensions of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: impact for clinical target volume definition]. Cancer Radiother. 2014; 18(7):666-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.04.006. View