» Articles » PMID: 30093860

Optimal Regimens and Cutoff Evaluation of Tildipirosin Against

Overview
Journal Front Pharmacol
Date 2018 Aug 11
PMID 30093860
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(PM) can invade the upper respiratory tract of the body and cause death and high morbidity. Tildipirosin, a new 16-membered-ring macrolide antimicrobial, has been recommended for the treatment of respiratory diseases. The objective of this research was to improve the dose regimes of tildipirosin to PM for reducing the macrolides resistance development with the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach and to establish an alternate cutoff for tildipirosin against PM. A single dose (4 mg/kg body weight) of tildipirosin was administered via intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v.) injection to the pigs. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of clinical isolates (112) were measured in the range of 0.0625-32 μg/ml, and the MIC and MIC values were 0.5 and 2 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC of the selected PM04 was 2 and 0.5 μg/ml in the tryptic soy broth (TSB) and serum, respectively. The main pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters including the area under the curve at 24 h (AUC), AUC, terminal half-life (), the time to peak concentration (), peak concentration (), relative total systemic clearance (CL), and the last mean residence time (MRT) were calculated to be 7.10, 7.94 μgh/ml, 24.02, NA h, NA μg/ml, 0.46 L/hkg, 8.06 h and 3.94, 6.79 μgh/ml, 44.04, 0.25 h, 0.98 μg/ml, 0.43 L/hkg, 22.85 h after i.v. and i.m. induction, respectively. Moreover, the bioavailability of i.m. route was 85.5%, and the unbinding of tildipirosin to serum protein was 78%. The parameters AUC/MIC in serum for bacteriostatic, bactericidal, and elimination activities were calculated as 18.91, 29.13, and 34.03 h based on the inhibitory sigmoid modeling. According to the Monte Carlo simulation, the optimum doses for bacteriostatic, bactericidal, and elimination activities were 6.10, 9.41, and 10.96 mg/kg for 50% target and 7.86, 12.17, and 14.57 mg/kg for 90% target, respectively. The epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) was calculated to be 4 μg/ml which could cover 95% wild-type clinical isolates distribution. The PK-PD cutoff (CO) was analyzed to be 0.25 μg/ml for tildipirosin against PM based on the Monte Carlo simulation. Compared with these two cutoff values, the finial susceptible breakpoint was defined as 4 μg/ml. The data presented now provides the optimal regimens (12.17 mg/kg) and susceptible breakpoint (4 μg/ml) for clinical use, but these predicted data should be validated in the clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of Amoxicillin Against in Dogs.

Jeong J, Kim J, Kim J, Kim C, Chung E, Boo S Pathogens. 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39770380 PMC: 11679838. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13121121.


Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of gamithromycin against rabbit pasteurellosis.

Wei X, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Fu W, Zhong L, Pan Y BMC Vet Res. 2024; 20(1):147.

PMID: 38643185 PMC: 11031915. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03988-y.


Brazilian Clinical Strains of and : Capsular Diversity, Antimicrobial Susceptibility () and Proof of Concept for Prevention of Natural Colonization by Multi-Doses Protocol of Tildipirosin.

Kuchiishi S, Ramos Prigol S, Bresolin E, Fernandes Lenhard B, Pissetti C, Garcia-Iglesias M Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 38136692 PMC: 10740920. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12121658.


Combination Therapy with TCM Preparation Kumu Injection and Azithromycin against Bacterial Infection and Inflammation: and .

Yu M, Gu X, Qu Y, Sun F, Li Y, Zhao F Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:8533005.

PMID: 35341154 PMC: 8942630. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8533005.


Prudent Use of Tylosin for Treatment of Based on Its Clinical Breakpoint and Lung Microbiota Shift.

Huang A, Wang S, Guo J, Gu Y, Li J, Huang L Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:712473.

PMID: 34566919 PMC: 8458857. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712473.


References
1.
Chigutsa E, Meredith S, Wiesner L, Padayatchi N, Harding J, Moodley P . Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin in South African patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(7):3857-63. PMC: 3393408. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00048-12. View

2.
Andersen N, Poehlsgaard J, Warrass R, Douthwaite S . Inhibition of protein synthesis on the ribosome by tildipirosin compared with other veterinary macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(11):6033-6. PMC: 3486562. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01250-12. View

3.
Robertson S, Lascelles B, Taylor P, Sear J . PK-PD modeling of buprenorphine in cats: intravenous and oral transmucosal administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 28(5):453-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2005.00677.x. View

4.
Toutain P, Potter T, Pelligand L, Lacroix M, Illambas J, Lees P . Standard PK/PD concepts can be applied to determine a dosage regimen for a macrolide: the case of tulathromycin in the calf. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 40(1):16-27. DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12333. View

5.
Aliabadi F, Lees P . Antibiotic treatment for animals: effect on bacterial population and dosage regimen optimisation. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000; 14(4):307-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(00)00142-4. View