» Articles » PMID: 30086283

Utility of Biomarkers to Improve Prediction of Readmission or Mortality After Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Background: Hospital readmission within 30 days is associated with higher risks of complications, death, and increased costs. Accurate statistical models to stratify the risk of 30-day readmission or death after cardiac surgery could help clinical teams focus care on those patients at highest risk. We hypothesized biomarkers could improve prediction for readmission or mortality.

Methods: Levels of ST2, galectin-3, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, cystatin C, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 were measured in samples from 1,046 patients discharged after isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery from eight medical centers, with external validation in 1,194 patients from five medical centers. Thirty-day readmission or mortality were ascertained using Medicare, state all-payer claims, and the National Death Index. We tested and externally validated the clinical models and the biomarker panels using area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROC) statistics.

Results: There were 112 patients (10.7%) who were readmitted or died within 30 days after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons augmented clinical model resulted in an AUROC of 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.71). The biomarker panel with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons augmented clinical model resulted in an AUROC of 0.74 (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.79, p < 0.0001). External validation of the model showed limited improvement with the addition of a biomarker panel, with an AUROC of 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.45 to 0.56).

Conclusions: Although biomarkers significantly improved prediction of 30-day readmission or mortality in our derivation cohort, the external validation of the biomarker panel was poor. Biomarkers perform poorly, much like other efforts to improve prediction of readmission, suggesting there are many other factors yet to be explored to improve prediction of readmission.

Citing Articles

Derivation and validation of predictive indices for cardiac readmission after coronary and valvular surgery - A multicenter study.

Sun L, Chu A, Tam D, Wang X, Fang J, Austin P Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 28:100285.

PMID: 38511073 PMC: 10946031. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100285.


Proenkephalin A and bioactive adrenomedullin are useful for risk prognostication in cardiac surgery.

Hill A, Bergmann D, Schulte J, Zayat R, Marx G, Simon T Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 9:1017867.

PMID: 36756642 PMC: 9900105. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017867.


Diagnostic accuracy of copeptin and NT-proBNP level in predicting mortality and postoperative prognosis in coronary surgery with respect to EuroSCORE risk.

Gocer S, Ilkeli E, Duzgun A Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023; 19(4):205-210.

PMID: 36643348 PMC: 9809194. DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2022.122090.


Selective biomarkers for inflammation and infection are associated with post-operative complications following transperineal template prostate biopsy (TTPB): a single-centre observational clinical pilot-study.

Snyper N, Pike J, Ekwueme K, Shergill I, Hughes S Eur J Med Res. 2022; 27(1):187.

PMID: 36154663 PMC: 9511755. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00807-8.


Can diverse population characteristics be leveraged in a machine learning pipeline to predict resource intensive healthcare utilization among hospital service areas?.

Ricket I, MacKenzie T, Emond J, Ailawadi K, Brown J BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):847.

PMID: 35773679 PMC: 9248096. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08154-4.


References
1.
DAgostino R, Jacobson J, Clarkson M, Svensson L, Williamson C, Shahian D . Readmission after cardiac operations: prevalence, patterns, and predisposing factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999; 118(5):823-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70051-6. View

2.
Brown J, Hernandez Jr F, Klemperer J, Clough R, Dipierro F, Hofmaster P . Cardiac troponin T levels in on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2006; 10(1):E42-6. DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20061105. View

3.
Harrell Jr F, Lee K, Mark D . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15(4):361-87. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4. View

4.
Wang T, Wollert K, Larson M, Coglianese E, McCabe E, Cheng S . Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2012; 126(13):1596-604. PMC: 3656719. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.129437. View

5.
Kerr K, Meisner A, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Coca S, Parikh C . Developing risk prediction models for kidney injury and assessing incremental value for novel biomarkers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 9(8):1488-96. PMC: 4123400. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10351013. View