» Articles » PMID: 30082927

Examining the Influence of CS Duration and US Density on Cue-potentiated Feeding Through Analyses of Licking Microstructure

Overview
Journal Learn Motiv
Date 2018 Aug 8
PMID 30082927
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the current study, groups of mice were trained with either short (20 s) or long (120 s) conditioned stimulus (CS) durations associated with different rates of sucrose unconditioned stimulus (US) delivery, to examine whether different behavioral forms of cue-potentiated feeding in sated mice would be evoked. In training mice received presentations of an auditory CS for 20 s during which a sucrose US was delivered at a density of 1/9 s (Group-20-s). A second group of mice received an auditory CS for 120 s and a US density of 1/49 s (Group-120-s). During training, a shorter CS duration and higher rate of US delivery resulted in greater acquisition of food cup responding, and during the test stage Group-20-s mice also displayed higher CS evoked lick rates, though all mice showed cue-potentiated feeding. An analysis of licking microstructure also revealed that Group-120-s mice displayed CS evoked licking behavior that reflected an increase in the perceived palatability of the sucrose US. These findings are discussed with respect to the influence of CS interval and US density on associatively activated sensory and affective representations of a US, and contrast mediated effects resulting from presentation of excitatory and inhibitory conditioned stimuli.

Citing Articles

Harmonization of the fastest and densest responses reflects humanlike reaction time in mice.

Kim C Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1501374.

PMID: 39944893 PMC: 11813871. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1501374.


Devaluing memories of reward: a case for dopamine.

Fry B, Russell N, Fex V, Mo B, Pence N, Beatty J Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):161.

PMID: 39900665 PMC: 11790953. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07440-7.


Dopamine, activation of ingestion and evaluation of response efficacy: a focus on the within-session time-course of licking burst number.

DAquila P Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 241(6):1111-1124.

PMID: 38702473 PMC: 11106101. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06600-1.


Disentangling the role of NAc D1 and D2 cells in hedonic eating.

Guillaumin M, Viskaitis P, Bracey E, Burdakov D, Peleg-Raibstein D Mol Psychiatry. 2023; 28(8):3531-3547.

PMID: 37402855 PMC: 10618099. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02131-x.


Memantine effects on ingestion microstructure and the effect of administration time: A within-subject study.

Galistu A, DAquila P PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0239270.

PMID: 32936829 PMC: 7494107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239270.


References
1.
Davis J, Levine M . A model for the control of ingestion. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(4):379-412. View

2.
Pearce J, Hall G . A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol Rev. 1980; 87(6):532-52. View

3.
Stellar E, Hill J . The rats rate of drinking as a function of water deprivation. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952; 45(1):96-102. DOI: 10.1037/h0062150. View

4.
Holland P . Temporal control in Pavlovian occasion setting. Behav Processes. 2014; 44(2):225-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00051-5. View

5.
Frey P, Butler C . Rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus duration. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973; 85(2):289-94. DOI: 10.1037/h0035035. View