» Articles » PMID: 30078037

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pediatric Adnexal Masses and Mimics

Overview
Journal Pediatr Radiol
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2018 Aug 6
PMID 30078037
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evaluation of adnexal masses in children and adolescents relies on imaging for appropriate diagnosis and management. Pelvic MRI is indicated and adds value for all adnexal masses when surgery is considered or when ultrasound findings are indeterminate. Specifically, features on MR imaging can help distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, which not only influences the decision between surgery and conservative treatment, but also the type of surgery to be performed, including potential use of fertility-sparing approaches with minimally invasive techniques. Larger size, younger age, presentation with precocious puberty or virilization, restricted diffusion in a solid mass, and rapid and strong enhancement of solid components are all features concerning for malignancy. In addition, distinctive MR imaging features of adnexal masses, combined with clinical and laboratory biomarkers, might suggest a specific histological diagnosis.

Citing Articles

MRI of pediatric ovarian masses: validation of the O-RADS framework.

Munari A, Monti C, Viglio C, Folco G, Rizzetto F, Zirpoli S Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39939426 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11444-0.


Ovarian Masses in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Literature with Emphasis on the Diagnostic Approach.

Birbas E, Kanavos T, Gkrozou F, Skentou C, Daniilidis A, Vatopoulou A Children (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508611 PMC: 10377960. DOI: 10.3390/children10071114.


MR imaging in discriminating between benign and malignant paediatric ovarian masses: a systematic review.

van Nimwegen L, Mavinkurve-Groothuis A, de Krijger R, Hulsker C, Goverde A, Zsiros J Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(2):1166-1181.

PMID: 31529256 PMC: 6957553. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06420-4.

References
1.
Guerriero S, Testa A, Timmerman D, Van Holsbeke C, Ajossa S, Fischerova D . Imaging of gynecological disease (6): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of ovarian dysgerminoma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 37(5):596-602. DOI: 10.1002/uog.8958. View

2.
Outwater E, Huang A, Dunton C, Talerman A, Capuzzi D . Papillary projections in ovarian neoplasms: appearance on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997; 7(4):689-95. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070414. View

3.
Jung S, Lee J, Eun Rha S, Byun J, Jung J, Hahn S . CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2002; 22(6):1305-25. DOI: 10.1148/rg.226025033. View

4.
Stankovic Z, Sedlecky K, Savic D, Lukac B, Mazibrada I, Perovic S . Ovarian Preservation from Tumors and Torsions in Girls: Prospective Diagnostic Study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30(3):405-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.01.008. View

5.
Mohaghegh P, Rockall A . Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques. Radiographics. 2012; 32(6):1751-73. DOI: 10.1148/rg.326125520. View