» Articles » PMID: 30076343

Two Drosophila Neuropeptide Y-like Neurons Define a Reward Module for Transforming Appetitive Odor Representations to Motivation

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Aug 5
PMID 30076343
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuropeptides, many of which are conserved among vertebrate and invertebrate animals, are implicated in the regulation of motivational states that selectively facilitate goal-directed behaviors. After a brief presentation of appetitive odors, Drosophila larvae display an impulsive-like feeding activity in readily accessible palatable food. This innate appetitive response may require coordinated signaling activities of dopamine (DA) and neuropeptide F (NPF; a fly homolog of neuropeptide Y). Here we provide anatomical and functional evidence, at single-cell resolution, that two NPF neurons define a reward module in the highest-order brain region for cognitive processing of food-related olfactory representations. First, laser lesioning of these NPF neurons abolished odor induction of appetitive arousal, while their genetic activation mimicked the behavioral effect of appetitive odors. Further, a circuit analysis shows that each of the two NPF neurons relays its signals to a subset of target neurons in the larval hindbrain-like region. Finally, the NPF neurons discriminatively responded to appetitive odor stimuli, and their odor responses were blocked by targeted lesioning of a pair of dopaminergic third-order olfactory neurons that appear to be presynaptic to the NPF neurons. Therefore, the two NPF neurons contribute to appetitive odor induction of impulsive-like feeding by selectively decoding DA-encoded ascending olfactory inputs and relaying NPF-encoded descending motivational outputs for behavioral execution.

Citing Articles

A STIM dependent dopamine-neuropeptide axis maintains the larval drive to feed and grow in Drosophila.

Kasturacharya N, Dhall J, Hasan G PLoS Genet. 2023; 19(6):e1010435.

PMID: 37363909 PMC: 10328320. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010435.


Endocrine cybernetics: neuropeptides as molecular switches in behavioural decisions.

Nassel D, Zandawala M Open Biol. 2022; 12(7):220174.

PMID: 35892199 PMC: 9326288. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220174.


Cholecystokinin/sulfakinin peptide signaling: conserved roles at the intersection between feeding, mating and aggression.

Nassel D, Wu S Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022; 79(3):188.

PMID: 35286508 PMC: 8921109. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04214-4.


Cholecystokinin-like peptide mediates satiety by inhibiting sugar attraction.

Guo D, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Li J, Guo C, Pan Y PLoS Genet. 2021; 17(8):e1009724.

PMID: 34398892 PMC: 8366971. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009724.


Transcriptome Analysis of NPFR Neurons Reveals a Connection Between Proteome Diversity and Social Behavior.

Ryvkin J, Bentzur A, Shmueli A, Tannenbaum M, Shallom O, Dokarker S Front Behav Neurosci. 2021; 15:628662.

PMID: 33867948 PMC: 8044454. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.628662.


References
1.
Ramaekers A, Magnenat E, Marin E, Gendre N, Jefferis G, Luo L . Glomerular maps without cellular redundancy at successive levels of the Drosophila larval olfactory circuit. Curr Biol. 2005; 15(11):982-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.032. View

2.
Wang Y, Pu Y, Shen P . Neuropeptide-gated perception of appetitive olfactory inputs in Drosophila larvae. Cell Rep. 2013; 3(3):820-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.003. View

3.
Brown M, Crim J, Arata R, Cai H, Chun C, Shen P . Identification of a Drosophila brain-gut peptide related to the neuropeptide Y family. Peptides. 1999; 20(9):1035-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-9781(99)00097-2. View

4.
Cao G, Platisa J, Pieribone V, Raccuglia D, Kunst M, Nitabach M . Genetically targeted optical electrophysiology in intact neural circuits. Cell. 2013; 154(4):904-13. PMC: 3874294. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.027. View

5.
Ramaekers M, Boesveldt S, Lakemond C, van Boekel M, Luning P . Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013; 38(5):650-6. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.143. View