» Articles » PMID: 30073010

Effect of Sugar Beet Genotype, Planting and Harvesting Dates and Their Interaction on Sugar Yield

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2018 Aug 4
PMID 30073010
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Climate changes are affecting the plant production, including sugar beet growing especially in the southern and central parts of the Europe. Modifying the sowing and harvesting dates are one of the most often used adaptations in sugar beet cultivation. The aim of this study was to assess the interactions between planting date and sugar beet genotypes for different harvest dates with recommendation for duration of vegetation period for specific hybrids in order to achieve the best performance and to evaluate influence of climatic factors on sugar yield. Three-way analysis of variance and AMMI (Additive main effect and multiple interactions) analysis were performed to investigate interaction between main factors. Analysis of variance revealed that genotypes (G), planting date (PD), harvest date (HD) and interaction G × PD significantly affected sugar yield in 2016. In 2017 genotypes, planting date, harvest date and G x PD interaction significantly affected sugar yield on probability level of 1%, while PD × HD interaction had significant effect on probability level of 5%. Results of AMMI analysis enabled discrimination of genotypes with the highest level of stability in certain planting dates. Hybrids with combined yield and sugar content (NZ type) should have the advantage in earlier planting dates compared to of sugar beet hybrids with higher sugar content (Z type). However, in shortened vegetation period Z type hybrids are more stable and with better sugar yield results. Results of our study suggest that delaying the harvest date decreases differences between sugar yields obtained from hybrids sown in different planting dates. Major factors in the study affecting sugar yield were growing degree days, insolation and number of days from planting to harvest.

Citing Articles

Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for harvest date in sugar beet cultivars.

Sadeghzadeh Hemayati S, Hamdi F, Saremirad A, Hamze H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16015.

PMID: 38992210 PMC: 11239863. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67272-7.


Quantity and Quality Changes in Sugar Beet ( Provar. Altissima Doel) Induced by Different Sources of Biostimulants.

Rasovsky M, Pacuta V, Ducsay L, Lenicka D Plants (Basel). 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36079604 PMC: 9460262. DOI: 10.3390/plants11172222.


Unraveling metabolic patterns and molecular mechanisms underlying storability in sugar beet.

Gippert A, Madritsch S, Woryna P, Otte S, Mayrhofer M, Eigner H BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22(1):430.

PMID: 36076171 PMC: 9461268. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03784-6.


Impact of Superabsorbent Polymers and Variety on Yield, Quality and Physiological Parameters of the Sugar Beet ( prov. Doell).

Pacuta V, Rasovsky M, Michalska-Klimczak B, Wyszynski Z Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(4).

PMID: 33924309 PMC: 8070668. DOI: 10.3390/plants10040757.


Mitigation of emerging implications of climate change on food production systems.

Gomez-Zavaglia A, Mejuto J, Simal-Gandara J Food Res Int. 2020; 134:109256.

PMID: 32517948 PMC: 7176580. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109256.

References
1.
Schneider K, Schafer-Pregl R, Borchardt C, Salamini F . Mapping QTLs for sucrose content, yield and quality in a sugar beet population fingerprinted by EST-related markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 104(6-7):1107-1113. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-002-0890-8. View

2.
Schar C, Vidale P, Luthi D, Frei C, Haberli C, Liniger M . The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature. 2004; 427(6972):332-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature02300. View

3.
Malosetti M, Ribaut J, van Eeuwijk F . The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front Physiol. 2013; 4:44. PMC: 3594989. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00044. View

4.
Xu Y . Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants. Theor Appl Genet. 2016; 129(4):653-673. PMC: 4799247. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2691-5. View